They have a choice, look at mbk’s linkSo they should have a choice
They have a choice, look at mbk’s linkSo they should have a choice
Your second to last sentence is going off the rails a bitI honestly don't get what his point actually is.
Is it that, we don't need the new law because people can decide to commit suicide currently, or travel to Switzerland, whenever we like? And he seems to be ok with medical professionals murdering people, but doesn't want to give the patient a right to choose the timing?
Is that it?
Legally, come on !They have a choice, look at mbk’s link
I have and the pain management was excellent. I do not believe that hospice staff give lethal doses of drugs.You haven't been there at the end I guess
Nobody is saying it's wrong, but be clear, the patient had/has no choice
I suspect people change their mind over and over againNot if the person makes that CHOICE before they are at that stage.
People will have time to think about things.
What is wrong with having a choice ?
But maybe some will spend money on lawyers and not flights, to get somewhere that allows a choice
Medical Examiner's office was established pretty much with Shipman in mind. Too risky for a Hospice doctor/nurse to administer a lethal dose and risk external testing of the body. But they do their best to be generous with the drugs, to ease suffering.
I have and the pain management was excellent. I do not believe that hospice staff give lethal doses of drugs.
Your point?
It's called choiceI suspect people change their mind over and over again
I was wondering if you'd clarigy the point you're making in regard to using lethal drug doses: you say they don't do it, but insinuate they do.Your point?
Dress it up how you likeI have and the pain management was excellent. I do not believe that hospice staff give lethal doses of drugs.
No both posts show that hospice staff would risk their freedom if they did. All it takes is one grieving relative to say they think the doctor gave a lethal dose and the medical examiner office will investigate.I was wondering if you'd clarigy the point you're making in regard to using lethal drug doses: you say they don't do it, but insinuate they do.
They do not give fatal doses. They do give lots of drugs that reduce e pain, minimise mental suffering and all the other symptoms associated with dying.Dress it up how you like
Anyone who has been there has seen the suffering and the "increased" pain killers to help at the end.
Very necessary, very helpful, but it's assisted dying. You can call it what you like, but it is what it is
That's why the Assisted Dying Bill was passed, surely, to protect innocent people from prosecution. I'm sure Hospice staff administer a lethal does in the final hours, but consenting months in advance tkes the stress from people who wish to die peacefully at home.No both posts show that hospice staff would risk their freedom if they did. All it takes is one grieving relative to say they think the doctor gave a lethal dose and the medical examiner office will investigate.
Nothing in the DPP guidelines would protect a person who regularly did this.
Is it? You seem content with state sponsored murder but don't want people to be given the choice on their own terms.Your second to last sentence is going off the rails a bit