What's 1a have you made your own alternative list - I haven't seen it.
What's 1a have you made your own alternative list - I haven't seen it.
I suspect it was copyright infringement.So the noseall troll is reporting his troll sticker as abuse and getting it removed yet the actual trolling by noseall referring to someone's ability to properly use grammar and someone else's ability to read is left intact. Noseall has very thin skin.
View attachment 362119
Not by me.So the noseall troll is reporting his troll sticker as abuse and getting it removed
This was removed - your troll sticker that is awarded to you when you make a troll post. So if it wasn't you then it must of been one your boyfriends on here.Not by me.
I thought you were complementing me on my Tyrolean ski break, along with your poor spelling.
At least I have friends.then it must of been one your boyfriends on here.
"The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was 'raped' within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump 'raped' her as many people commonly understand the word 'rape,'" Kaplan wrote. "Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that."Not what he said. You’d know if you read the actual source
"The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was 'raped' within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump 'raped' her as many people commonly understand the word 'rape,'" Kaplan wrote. "Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that."
Trump - convicted felon and rapist.
It wasn't a criminal trial.That begs the obvious question, why wasn't he convicted of rape rather than sexual assault?
The burden of proof and time passed since he raped her. And the fact that Trump managed to stall long enough for deadline for discovery of evidence to expire.That begs the obvious question, why wasn't he convicted of rape rather than sexual assault?
Yes, and that the jury "did in fact" find he raped her.The judge said in effect we can go on the common meaning of the work "rape" as being much broader than an unwanted penis in vagina.
So she was telling the truth that he raped herthe defamation case found that she was substantially telling the truth
It looks like an even bigger jury of women didn't either care or believe it. They would rather vote for a rapist than another women.Yes, and that the jury "did indeed" find he raped her.
Cool.It looks like an even bigger jury of women didn't either care or believe it. They would rather vote for a rapist than another women.