Too close to call

Who will win

  • Trump

    Votes: 12 48.0%
  • Harris

    Votes: 13 52.0%

  • Total voters
    25
  • Poll closed .
"The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was 'raped' within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump 'raped' her as many people commonly understand the word 'rape,'" Kaplan wrote. "Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that."
Trump - convicted felon and rapist.
 
Sponsored Links
So she was telling the truth that he raped her

Im glad we finally got there, well done yuo took your time
Yes, and that the jury "did in fact" find he raped her.
No they found that she wasn't lying and defaming him with a false allegation. They did not and had no right or ground to rule that he was guilty of rape.

In other words they found that her account on the balance of probability (Preponderance of the evidence), was reasonably believable.

Had he said I'm not going to dignify her allegations with a response... well he'd probably be a bit richer.

Noseall will probably run this to a 100 pages with his incorrect statement
"Trump - convicted felon and rapist."

poor chap struggles with anything beyond the basics.
 
"Trump - convicted felon and rapist."
Correct.

"The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was 'raped' within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump 'raped' her as many people commonly understand the word 'rape,'" Kaplan wrote. "Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that."
 
Sponsored Links
A person has a higher chance of being assaulted by a white person due to the demographic. But once you adjust for that, you will find certain minority and religious groups are massively represented in prison.

Non-sequitor.


To assault does not necessarily mean prison time.
 
What we have here ladies and gentlemen is a classic text book RRL number 14 response
14 Accuse people of being XY or Z via some mental gymnastic spurious associations

1 "no it doesn't"
2 Utter nonsense.
3 Who are these you speak of?
4 It isn't being controlled by the lizards....
5 When did it say that
6 Ask them?
7 Seriously?
8 Then you will waste your time collating the proof and they will completely ignore it.
9 Completely make things up that you said and heavily edit your post to fit their point,
10 will make things up that you are thinking and post them in quote marks like its something that you actually said.
11 deliberately try to antagonise the poster to try and get the thread shut down or the poster banned.
12. Telling you, you ought to apologise, for correcting their incorrect fact.
13. Stating their opinion as fact, without any source or material to back it up. Otherwise known as a NotchyFact™
14 Accuse people of being XY or Z via some mental gymnastic spurious associations
Its actually best just to not reply and let them takeover and have their own circular Wan# over the subject
What does no 15 say about the upper earnings limit for voting labour?
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top