“Russia's disastrous tactics have been a terrible advertisement for tanks,” tweeted Nicholas Drummond, an armor consultant. “But we should be careful to avoid drawing the wrong conclusions,” he added. “No artillery support. No infantry support. No air support. This is not how combined-arms tactics work in an era of multi-domain operations
So says a WWII Nazi technique self professed expert in a war that just isn't like that one. Good job too.I think this article sheds light on why Russian tanks got so badly mauled. Poor planning and lack of joined up operations with infantry etc.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/davida...t-the-protection-of-infantry/?sh=42a150216ef3
This point has been made by most experts in the field, and is mostly common sense, the reason the allied forces lost so few men and equipment in Iraq was because of a combined forces approach, something the russians lack badly, in a conventional NATO v russia war they would be destoyed in weeks, the russian tactics in Ukraine belong in WW1.So says a WWII Nazi technique self professed expert in a war that just isn't like that one. Good job too.
This point has been made by most experts in the field, and is mostly common sense, the reason the allied forces lost so few men and equipment in Iraq was because of a combined forces approach, something the russians lack badly, in a conventional NATO v russia war they would be destoyed in weeks, the russian tactics in Ukraine belong in WW1.
Reports suggest ? That Putin is going to order another mobilisation of up to half a million men ???
Russian communications have been comprehensively penetrated.The US military intelligence has been pretty on point throughout the entire war,
How do you know?Russian communications have been comprehensively penetrated.
The Ukrainians are told whatever US thinks they ought to know.
it'a been mentioned vaguely and sounded like it was put down to using mobile phones. Military radio gear is not easy to break into. Some hand held stuff is available commercially.How do you know?