Angela Rayner

[carmanmemoranda]

If you aren’t defending her why are you so upset with her lies and mistakes being discussed.

JohnD is obsessed with a lady who makes women’s bras. I see no “wait for the trial” comment from you and no chastisement of his double standards claiming my comments are unproven while she has yet to be charged with anything.

I've clearly said I will wait for the full inquiry and accept whatever comes her way.

How you interpret that as defending her says more about you than me.

I just need proof. You are happy with smears. As long as its labour

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Can you find any that are just that and not stating its all a smear and made up first?

Yes. Simply.

Show us the proof of her guilt. Then it can't be smears can it.

Oh, no proof? Oh I see. Smears it is then

 

[motorbiking]

Accepting a tax expert's opinion on a tax matter is reasonable.
Relying on it for the cost of a kitchen refit is desperate.

If you're a lawyer, you're a comedically shoite one.

Nonsense.

Have you seen the photos.

 

[motorbiking]

I have absolutely no idea what you are talking about here. About fifty pages ago, I noticed there was a lot of confusion on here about the rules on main residence for CGT, so I posted an explanation and linked it to the HMRC sources.

So you are familiar with the 4 times rule and the requirement to declare anyway.

 

[JonathanM]

Have you seen the photos.

Snobby much?

 

[denso13]

Have you seen the photos.

Irrelevant. You have found someone guilty based on photos of a kitchen/bathroom? Must be a wind up...

 

[JonathanM]

So you are familiar with the 4 times rule and the requirement to declare anyway.

I know she should have declared. But who is going to care if her liability is zero?

After all this, her only "crime" is failing to file a form saying that she had zero tax to pay?

 

[motorbiking]

It's merely fact that it did not credibly cost £23k. It's also a fact that she had to declare anyway.

If she had apologised for the mistake this would have gone away instantly.

The rules around married couples from a tax and ownership point of view are archaic.

 

[JonathanM]

It's merely fact that it did not credibly cost £23k £15k

 

[denso13]

It's merely fact that it did not credibly cost £23k

Or £15k. You are being dishonest.

She needs evidence of the costs. If she can't prove her claim then she will be found wanting.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

If she had apologised for the mistake this would have gone away instantly.

The only people interested still are you, filly, Betty. Andydevon.

Everybody else is just waiting for the outcome

 

[Brigadier]

Have you seen the photos.

Do you even know what "expert witness" means?
Without googling, natch

 

[motorbiking]

The only people interested still are you, filly, Betty. Andydevon.

Everybody else is just waiting for the outcome

And posting constantly, with apparently nothing to contribute.

 

[motorbiking]

Or £15k. You are being dishonest.

She needs evidence of the costs. If she can't prove her claim then she will be found wanting.

And she needed to disclose within 60 days.

 

[noseall]

If she had apologised for the mistake this would have gone away instantly.

To whom?