So why dont they do it now then ---- oh let me think - noting to do with 2028 being 12monts away from a general election"Autumn Budget 2024: income tax thresholds to rise from 2028
Chancellor won't extend the freeze on income tax and personal National Insurance thresholds"
Not before time. The Tory freeze was unfair.
How will paying people more mean that they can feed themselves any better than now.People can't afford to live on the wages they currently get, there are millions in full time work and suffering food insecurity
That tells Motorbiming wants people to earn a wage that doesn't given them enough to pay to eat enough.
At retirement age the average pension pot is 194kThe average person approaching retirement has aound £100,000 in their pension scheme.
Sadly, a great many have less.
Biking does not comprehend the word "modest."
"
Until a law is introduced we can only expect and overview. More details will get added and other loops looked into. An example is givenI don't think they are suggesting a cohabiting couple creates a dependant relationship, but it would be a good move if it did.
Here you go,,,I think you're gonna need to walk me through those calculations. They sound like the sort of savings my other half claims when the new shoes she buys at £200, down to £50, give her a saving of £150.
IHT - Is estates more than £325k. Not £1M. Remember an unmarried cohabiting couple has no ability to pool their allowances.
But to answer your question its better to have people with limited skills to add value to a business, partly subsidised by the UK tax payer, than have them out of work and their job performed by someone in a cheaper economy.
Yes, but then a great deal of that goes on hotel bills.After all, we are saving billions not being in the EU any more, aren't we?
Thanks for the details.. So to sum up.Here you go,,,
Generally, you can take a tax-free lump sum from your pension of 25% of your pension pot, up to a maximum across all your arrangements of £268,275. This is your lump sum allowance.
Under certain circumstances, either:
Both are tax-free up to a maximum of £1,073,100. This is your lump sum and death benefit allowance.
- you can also receive a serious ill-health lump sum
- your beneficiaries can receive a lump sum death benefit
Any tax-free lump sums and lump sum death benefits will count towards your overall limit of £1,073,100.
If you have protected allowances, the amount of tax-free lump sum you can take and your overall tax-free limit may be higher. Your entitlement amount depends on the protection or enhancement that you hold.
You may have a protection cessation event that means you are no longer entitled to protected allowances. In this case, you will also no longer have entitlement to a higher tax-free lump sum and higher lump sum and lump sum death benefit allowance.
So on your million that you paid tax on say from share dealing or buying paying if you are a good citizen 24% CGT if you are unscrupled you could net off losses eg write down the value of assets to lower your CGT charge and then by placing ito a defined contribution pension the beneficiaries receive up to 1 million tax free, if it was under IHT then they would pay IHT at 40% over 325K.... its called tax dodging.
And remember that's per person so your spouse, mr/mrs/other, could do excatly the same thus passing on 2.1 million free of IHT... where as you wee man pass on £325k and your beneficiaries get taxed at 40% of any residual, unless of course its the family home... but if you have two children then they will have to pay CGT on any gain from selling said house to get their money out...
What’s the sort of 'tax dodging' you employ John? You've never said what your definition of 'tax dodging' is, have you? So what is tax avoidance in your eyes? Tax evasion? ISA's? Personal allowances? Salary sacrifice? Pension payments? Side hustles? Dividend payments? Premium bonds? Something else? All legal as far as I know but feel free to let us know so know where you’re coming from?Just the sort of tax-dodging that biking likes.
Yes as per my example - Judy gets f***Until a law is introduced we can only expect and overview. More details will get added and other loops looked into. An example is given
Example 1
An estate is made up of a free estate valued at £1 million and a pension fund valued at £100,000. It benefits from the £325,000 Inheritance Tax nil-rate band. No other nil-rate bands, exemptions or reliefs apply. The pension fund passes to Judy. The Inheritance Tax bill for the free estate (the £1 million) is £281,818.18. The Inheritance Tax bill for the pension fund (the £100,000) is £28,181.82. The PRs pay the whole of the £310,000 Inheritance Tax due, but are entitled to be reimbursed the £28,181.82 from Judy. Judy’s marginal rate of Income Tax is 40%. Judy therefore has to withdraw sufficient funds from her pension so that she has £28,181.82 to pay to the PR after paying Income Tax at her marginal rate.
As her marginal rate is 40%, she has to withdraw £46,969.70 from the pension fund (£46,969.70 income - £18,787.88 Income Tax at marginal rate = £28,181.82 received). So, to settle her Inheritance Tax liability, Judy has had to withdraw much more from her pension. Judy has paid £46,969.70 in Inheritance Tax and Income Tax on the pension fund and will still be liable for Income Tax at her marginal rate when accessing the £53,030.30 remaining in the pension.
No... You don't pay tax on it whilst its in a pension.Thanks for the details.. So to sum up.
You make a million as income/capital and pay tax on it,
You put this into your pension and pay tax on it.
If you draw it down you pay tax on it as income (above the cash free limit)
If you pass it to "common law spouse" when you die they pay tax on it,
doesn't sound much like a tax dodge to me.