Nope - I want employers to be incentivised to give young people a break on their first Job. That just ended,
Young people are still cheaper than older people. That has not ended.
Nope - I want employers to be incentivised to give young people a break on their first Job. That just ended,
No it hasn't. The warnings come up every time there is an increase, it was also forecast to be catastrophic when first introduced. It wasn't.That just ended
Thank you for admitting you want wages to be so low people can't afford to eat.Nope - I want employers to be incentivised to give young people a break on their first Job. That just ended,
9 or will make things up that you are thinkingThank you for admitting you want wages to be so low people can't afford to eat.
but the exam question was:I've given an example of the sort of person who would lose the tax loophole.
It is accurate.
You falsely pretended it would apply to
So lets run the numbers:Imagine a couple living together in a house worth 500k and a drawdown pension with £300k left in. The holder dies, these are not wealthy people. That’s a massive tax bill on the survivor. That’s the pension wiped out.
and a number 1 from denso139 or will make things up that you are thinking
Highest group unemployed.No it hasn't. The warnings come up every time there is an increase, it was also forecast to be catastrophic when first introduced. It wasn't.
Only in one area really. How long does a new scanner last? How long will it take to repair a number of buildings? and .........................You don't suddenly inject a boost in capital expenditure and expect to reduce it in 2 years time.
They paid their dues?I'm sure you can work out what this means
So what? People deserve a living wage.Highest group unemployed.
Wealthier than most people I know.Imagine a couple living together in a house worth 500k and a drawdown pension with £300k left in. The holder dies, these are not wealthy people.
2.5 X more than before. I wonder what kind of life someone can expect having their Pension income reduced by more than 50% due to tax.They paid their dues?
I'm sure you can do the sums on someone with a £325k house and £200k pension pot.You pretend not to know what "modest" means
You want pension schemes to be a dodge to avoid inheritance tax.
That's not what they were given their special concessions for.
Do you even know what sort of income loss that is?Wealthier than most people I know.
Not much good if you can't get a job as evidenced by the data.So what? People deserve a living wage.
Better when you do.Not much good if you can't get a job.
Over 86% are employed and deserve the increase.as evidenced by the data