What, undoing Brexit damage? There is a way to go yet. Slowly but surely.
It won't be many years though before there will be no one of any significance, left to complain, if we do regain ties with the EU.
Dominic Raab. How long has he got.......
- Thread starter Dan Can
- Start date
It won't be many years though before there will be no one of any significance, left to complain, if we do regain ties with the EU.
Sponsored Links
The report conclusion states that it only upholds 2 of the complaints and that it is the decision of the PM to decide whether they broke the Ministerial Code.
- Joined
- 25 Jul 2022
- Messages
- 13,684
- Reaction score
- 1,082
- Country
The same conclusion that I read?
In reaching and implementing this management choice he acted in a way which was intimidating, in the sense of unreasonably and persistently aggressive conduct in the context of a work meeting. It also involved an abuse or misuse of power in a way that undermines or humiliates. He introduced an unwarranted punitive element. His conduct was experienced as undermining or humiliating by the affected individual, which was inevitable. It is to be inferred that the DPM was aware that this would be the effect of his conduct; at the very least, he should have been aware.
Also, for reference
As set out in paragraphs 53 and 57 above, for the purpose of this investigation under the Ministerial Code, conduct would fall within the description of ‘bullying’ if it can be characterised as: (1) Offensive, intimidating, malicious or insulting behaviour; or (2) Abuse or misuse of power in ways that undermine, humiliate, denigrate or injure the recipient17 .
(c) The DPM did not intend by the conduct described to upset or humiliate. Nor did he target anyone for a specific type of treatment
(d) His interruptive style is not itself behaviour that could be regarded as intimidating or insulting. However, individuals who had previously experienced the DPM express an unconstructive criticism of their work (and understood it as a criticism of them personally) might reasonably have interpreted a series of interruptions as a form of implicit criticism. The combination of unconstructive critical feedback and regular interruption is likely to be experienced as intimidating, in the sense of being unreasonably difficult to deal with, and plainly was so experienced by some individuals.
(e) The DPM was not aware, nor could he reasonably have been aware, of the impact on individuals in terms of what are said to have been the effects of his behaviour on their health.
(f) Adopting the language of Dame Sue Owen’s report (while acknowledging that it is not part of the definition accepted in the FDA Case and that both types of conduct may amount to bullying), the DPM’s conduct during the MoJ Period was sometimes ‘abrasive’, in the sense of a personal style which is or feels intimidating or insulting to the individual, but is not intended to be so. His conduct was not, however, ‘abusive’, in the sense of behaviour which is intended and specifically targeted.
(d) His interruptive style is not itself behaviour that could be regarded as intimidating or insulting. However, individuals who had previously experienced the DPM express an unconstructive criticism of their work (and understood it as a criticism of them personally) might reasonably have interpreted a series of interruptions as a form of implicit criticism. The combination of unconstructive critical feedback and regular interruption is likely to be experienced as intimidating, in the sense of being unreasonably difficult to deal with, and plainly was so experienced by some individuals.
(e) The DPM was not aware, nor could he reasonably have been aware, of the impact on individuals in terms of what are said to have been the effects of his behaviour on their health.
(f) Adopting the language of Dame Sue Owen’s report (while acknowledging that it is not part of the definition accepted in the FDA Case and that both types of conduct may amount to bullying), the DPM’s conduct during the MoJ Period was sometimes ‘abrasive’, in the sense of a personal style which is or feels intimidating or insulting to the individual, but is not intended to be so. His conduct was not, however, ‘abusive’, in the sense of behaviour which is intended and specifically targeted.
Sponsored Links
- Joined
- 25 Jul 2022
- Messages
- 13,684
- Reaction score
- 1,082
- Country
- Joined
- 25 Jul 2022
- Messages
- 13,684
- Reaction score
- 1,082
- Country
So, no fault attached to him then? Not sure that that is what the report says.
A good leader inspires those around him.
Out of his depth in a car park puddle, more like.
Raab received counselling from his Perm Sec at the FCO. Ignored him.
Quite rightly so given that it was because Raab had given Hugh Elliot (Ambassador to Spain) a *******ing for proposing allowing Spanish soldiers to be stationed in Gibraltar during Brexit negotiations, which was completely against the UK govt position.
That dressing down was one of the upheld complaints.
Frankly Raab didn't go far enough, Hugh Elliot should have been done for treason.
I feel very hurt by your post., and i ain't even a civil servant, i want compo!
the problem with the House of Commons MPs and all the other pencil pushers and paper shufflers involved in government
There are no X blue collar workers
A significant portion of the population are not represented
Full of fruit cakes who have never done a days ( grafting) work in there
Lives
Bunch of b*** ends
There are no X blue collar workers
A significant portion of the population are not represented
Full of fruit cakes who have never done a days ( grafting) work in there
Lives
Bunch of b*** ends
Too many compo lawyers on the loose.
All depends on your definition of a 'bad leader'.
Hilter thought Winston Churchill was a bad leader.
Sponsored Links
