Undoubtedly true, but I think that a fair few food items tend to become somewhat unpleasant (although perfectly safe) when exposed to such low temps.Buy a medical one. If it's at -60 when the power goes it will probably last more than 24 hours.
Undoubtedly true, but I think that a fair few food items tend to become somewhat unpleasant (although perfectly safe) when exposed to such low temps.Buy a medical one. If it's at -60 when the power goes it will probably last more than 24 hours.
Though it's a small amount of air, really, and a consequently small amount of heat energy admitted to the compartment by the warm air flowing in. There isn't going to be enough energy in it to defrost the contentsthereis an immediate loss of cold air
True but, as Harry pointed out, it does depend to some extent on how full the freezer is - if it is 'lmost empty,there's a fair bit of air to be 'exchanged' when the door opens.Though it's a small amount of air, really, and a consequently small amount of heat energy admitted to the compartment by the warm air flowing in. There isn't going to be enough energy in it to defrost the contents
If it were a totally empty 140 litre freezer that you completely evacuated of all its cold air and replaced with air at 20 degrees, it's only about enough energy to defrost a tenth of one beef burgerfair bit of air
You're probably rightIf it were a totally empty 140 litre freezer that you completely evacuated of all its cold air and replaced with air at 20 degrees, it's only about enough energy to defrost a tenth of one beef burger
It's eric you should tell that, not meDon't worry about it
I'm happy with stuff that's been in a non functioning freezer for at least 24-48 hours and, indeed, am also perfectly happy re-freezing stuff that has more-or-less completely thawed, should that ever happen!
Undoubtedly true, but I think that a fair few food items tend to become somewhat unpleasant (although perfectly safe) when exposed to such low temps.
Most people do ('follow the rule'), However, like you, I don't really understand how the rule came about ... and, indeed, there are now a good few things (particularly fish) which (if one looks carefully!) say that the have previously been frozen but are nevertheless safe to 're-freeze'!I have never quite understood, why they suggest never to refreeze, nor the logic, but I tend to follow the rule.
I'm not certain that it's true - but I have certainly heard it suggested a good few times.I didn't know that.
PossiblyI wonder if any lab workers have found that out the hard way after a lunchtime shopping trip to Iceland, thinking "I'll just stick this in the freezer until I go home.."
And if you look carefully you'll also see something about having been defrosted under controlled conditions. i.e. not in a warm oven/microwave/water bath/left out overnight...Most people do ('follow the rule'), However, like you, I don't really understand how the rule came about ... and, indeed, there are now a good few things (particularly fish) which (if one looks carefully!) say that the have previously been frozen but are nevertheless safe to 're-freeze'!
Indeed so - but I think all that probably means is that during previously de-frosting its temp was not allowed to rise to appreciably more that 0°C. The problem with trying to thaw something big (like a turkey) by leaving it in a warm (or even hot) place is that the outer parts will get quite warm (hence a lot of bacterial replication) long before the inner parts have thawed. However, again, that's probably not much of a problem if it is subsequently going to be 'properly cooked'.And if you look carefully you'll also see something about having been defrosted under controlled conditions. i.e. not in a warm oven/microwave/water bath/left out overnight...
Indeed so - anything significantly below about 0°C is probably pretty 'safe'. I think that at temps between 0°C and about -18°C, deterioration of 'quality' (taste and/or texture) may occur, hence the normal temp of 'food freezers'. However, as I said, I've also heard it said that 'quality' will again deteriorate if the temp gets a lot below -18°C - but, as I said, I don't know if that is true.But AIUI the main concern is quality, not safety.
I guess it would depend on the design of the freezer. I assume ours is similar, but I know for certain that my parents old upright had an expansion coil in the top (above the storage cavity) and a fan to circulate the air internally. The defrost would only heat that expansion coil (electrically) to melt off any ice, and that would not warm up the storage cavity much, or probably not at all.Probably true but, as I observed, having 'auto defrost' must result in at least some rise of cavity temp during the 'defrost cycle'
If it has a pressure sensor on the low pressure (LP) side of the refrigerant loop then it can calculate the temperature of the evaporator coil from that - given a known relationship between the boiling point of the refrigerant and the pressure. This is far more effective than trying to measure the actual temperature - which will be different in different parts of the expansion coil.The more the door is opened on an upright freezer, the more often the defrost cycle is initiated so not only measuring heat gained, but also cost of defrost cycles. The defrost cycle is not a simple timer, when I had the energy monitor on the upright, sometimes 36 hours between defrost cycles, other times only 6 hours, so something measures something, be it how long door open, or how much frost, not a clue.
I think it'll be one of those "it depends" things where it's simpler to have a simple rule (don't do X) rather than a complex list of rules (don't do X with Y, but you can do it with Z, and you can so it with W if you follow these precautions). Like "don't reheat chicken" - I suspect that's more because people have been doing it badly (i.e. not getting things good and hot to kill bugs) and then getting ill. Much easier to say "don't reheat chicken" than "if you're going to reheat chicken then you must do A and B".Most people do ('follow the rule'), However, like you, I don't really understand how the rule came about ... and, indeed, there are now a good few things (particularly fish) which (if one looks carefully!) say that the have previously been frozen but are nevertheless safe to 're-freeze'!
The basis of the concern is presumably that once products thaw, any viable bacteria within them will start proliferating, so that a lot more bacteria will be re-frozen' than were originally there - but, provided it is something that is going to be 'properly cooked' once it is ultimately used, I think that that represents a minimal risk.
And it's also an (illegal) way of home fortifying wine. Freeze it, pick out the ice crystals, wine now has a higher alcohol content.I note if you freeze beer, don't do this as illegal, but the water freezes out of the alcohol, making the pints drawn to start with higher in alcohol and the latter ones watered down, I know a pub where this had happened, and landlord taken to court for watering down the beer.
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local