Get the Tories Out!

  • Thread starter Deleted member 18243
  • Start date
I like this forum. A bit of vigorous debate is healthy.

My take is that both parties have become vague middle-ground mush and don't really stand for anything. You could agree or disagree with Thatcher, Kinnock or Corbyn, but at least they stood for something, had some aims for what they wanted to create and some plans for how to get there.

Sunak's our PM and I still don't have a clue what he wants to turn this nation into, he just seems to be a caretaker who somehow has an image as a safe pair of hands despite almost bankrupting the country with brainless giveaways during covid. But I also don't see Starmer presenting any alternative plan for a great and glorious future.

The current red and blue mobs are 90% identical. They want people to get into the sort of debate seen in this thread, e.g. red lot are great, blue lot are terrible or vice versa. This all serves them both, however terrible they are one or the other gets in then the others get a go a bit later after they inevitably trash the country again. No doubt they all chuckle about the peasants when they get together at the WEF conferences to hear the orders from their puppetmasters.

I care only partially about Reform's policies - it's chiefly going to be a protest vote, which is probably what a good chunk of the Leave vote was. But, having briefly looked at some of their ideas, they seem pretty sensible. E.g. abolish the house of lords, proportional representation (to hopefully permanently get us away from this two-party stitch-up), reform the BBC, actually take action against illegal immigration (and no, before the woke brigade dive in, being concerned about this doesn't make me an anything-ist). There are also things I disagree with, but this is how democracy works, hopefully nobody's actually brainwashed into believing in every aspect of the party they're voting for.

Reform's performance in the next GE may be as much of a shock as the outcome of the referendum. That should have given the establishment the kick it needed, but they've chosen to ignore it so the electorate will disobey the elite again. One possible outcome is that they'll split the Tory vote so Labour gets in. But it appears that many traditional Labour voters are also switching to them, so this isn't inevitable. We could end up with a hung parliament with Reform as a king-maker, which would put them in a very powerful position.
 
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Lawrence Fox of Refom? What's your point, that the WEF doesn't exist, or that it doesn't influence politicians? Both of which are definitely not true.
 
I like this forum. A bit of vigorous debate is healthy.

My take is that both parties have become vague middle-ground mush and don't really stand for anything. You could agree or disagree with Thatcher, Kinnock or Corbyn, but at least they stood for something, had some aims for what they wanted to create and some plans for how to get there.

Sunak's our PM and I still don't have a clue what he wants to turn this nation into, he just seems to be a caretaker who somehow has an image as a safe pair of hands despite almost bankrupting the country with brainless giveaways during covid. But I also don't see Starmer presenting any alternative plan for a great and glorious future.

The current red and blue mobs are 90% identical. They want people to get into the sort of debate seen in this thread, e.g. red lot are great, blue lot are terrible or vice versa. This all serves them both, however terrible they are one or the other gets in then the others get a go a bit later after they inevitably trash the country again. No doubt they all chuckle about the peasants when they get together at the WEF conferences to hear the orders from their puppetmasters.

I care only partially about Reform's policies - it's chiefly going to be a protest vote, which is probably what a good chunk of the Leave vote was. But, having briefly looked at some of their ideas, they seem pretty sensible. E.g. abolish the house of lords, proportional representation (to hopefully permanently get us away from this two-party stitch-up), reform the BBC, actually take action against illegal immigration (and no, before the woke brigade dive in, being concerned about this doesn't make me an anything-ist). There are also things I disagree with, but this is how democracy works, hopefully nobody's actually brainwashed into believing in every aspect of the party they're voting for.

Reform's performance in the next GE may be as much of a shock as the outcome of the referendum. That should have given the establishment the kick it needed, but they've chosen to ignore it so the electorate will disobey the elite again. One possible outcome is that they'll split the Tory vote so Labour gets in. But it appears that many traditional Labour voters are also switching to them, so this isn't inevitable. We could end up with a hung parliament with Reform as a king-maker, which would put them in a very powerful position.
Some of what you say is true. A lot of it is not

But the answer is not soundbites. Great slogans with nothing behind them.

It's no different to Boris. But some people love it.
 
But the answer is not soundbites. Great slogans with nothing behind them.

Seems like a pretty good summary of all politicians to me. What are they doing or not doing that's different to the existing parties? They give a list of plans, people vote for them or they don't, then they do (or often don't) enact them.

I'm not a Reform candidate or even a member, you're not going to disprove anything or trash my arguments by finding fault with them, I'm sure they have many. I'm just saying I'm picking them as my choice as the best of a bad bunch, and I suspect I'm part of a currently small snowball that's picking up pace pretty rapidly and is likely to get much, much bigger. Hopefully this will have a permanent effect on our voting system and we can get out of this duopoly, and end up with serious politicians discussing things like grown-ups instead of the current punch and judy show we pretend is a democracy.
 
Last edited:
Sorry , but
I'm not a Reform candidate or even a member, you're not going to disprove anything or trash my arguments by finding fault with them, I'm sure they have many. I'm just saying I'm picking them as my choice as the best of a bad bunch
Yes, it REALLY sounds as though you are not an acolyte especially because
... I suspect I'm part of a currently small snowball that's picking up pace pretty rapidly and is likely to get much, much bigger.
Lawrence Fox and Nigel Farage behaving like grown ups? You are 'avvin a larf, innit?
 
Wasn't that the inept Brown? Worst PM ever. He got handed the job on a plate, yet managed to fukk it up, along with the whole UK.
Wait, you think Brown was worse than all the prime minister's we've had since?
 
The notion that political parties/governments go to WEF conferences to get their orders from the "puppetmasters" is absurd.

Perhaps I over-egged the point! But they're undoubtedly influenced, why else would it even exist? Big business pays $10,000s per year just to be a member, do you think they pay this money just to be kind to the comedy bond villain that runs it?

One PM from each party, among many many others...


Sometimes if it looks and sounds like a conspiracy then it may be possible that perhaps it just is? This isn't tinfoil hat stuff - it's real, open and documented.
 
Sometimes if it looks and sounds like a conspiracy then it may be possible that perhaps it just is?
But the members don't all follow the same agenda, they obviously don't do what they are "told". Or is that just a double bluff to fool us all? Russia and China are members, so are Man Utd...
 
Sorry I've lost track of your point so don't know how to respond.

I think we agree that the WEF doesn't program the brains of their robotic servants.

I'm suggesting that they are influenced. Are you saying that no politician is ever swayed by an argument at a WEF conference?
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top