"Like we used to"? When, exactly? Did we 'used to' have 40,000 + per year crossing the channel in boats to process?I suggest starting off by processing them quickly, like we used to do
"Like we used to"? When, exactly? Did we 'used to' have 40,000 + per year crossing the channel in boats to process?I suggest starting off by processing them quickly, like we used to do
I thought the anti-foreigner Brexiteers and Priti 'pull-up-the-drawbridge' Patel had it all squared away?
Lol.
us ?Well one can never legislate for hostile states deliberately using migrants to cause chaos
If the people coming over knew there was a good chance they were going to be returned, they wouldn't be so keen on spending so much money to get here.It would be so effective that there must be some other reason, which evades my simple mind, for it not to be implemented. The trafficking gangs would soon get the message, as all of the boats they are buying will cost them dearly.
So you agree our Government is not very efficient or capableNo need for the SAS, I would set up a fleet of private rescue boats to assist them with their return while still in French waters. I'd give the government change for £60M also. I reckon there is some ground for a private company to leverage article 73 of the Code de procédure pénale.
us ?
I wonder how long it will be before the 'frothing at mouths' brexiteers suggest that the SAS use their inflatables to intercept the migrant's inflatables?
IMMIGRATION CRISIS
A lot is being spent and lives lost or ruined in attempts to stop the dangerous Channel crossing by inflatable boats full of Illegal Immigrants who claim they are fleeing danger, but in reality they are is no danger settling in France / Belgium etc so the journey to Britain is not justified on the grounds of War/Danger.
The solution is easy and I can't understand why it is not adopted and the solution is to slash the inflatables ON THE BEACH before anyone gets into them, then boats then become unusable for the intended trip and any future intended trips. The gangs ripping these asylum seekers off will soon get the idea and stop the illegal trade in lives within days.
The solution is easy so why is it not adopted immediately, it would save lives and stop the illegal traffic and the lining of the pockets of the gangs organising it.
I clearly have something wrong here otherwise the simple safe solution would be adopted. so what am I missing?
There were 85,000 asylum seeker claims in 2003"Like we used to"? When, exactly? Did we 'used to' have 40,000 + per year crossing the channel in boats to process?
Yes it is.Many of our country's problems are easy to solve
Increase immigration by how much? There are already around 1000 coming every day, and we now have 10 million of the population who were not born here. With that 10 million figure in mind why are there still unfilled jobs if migrants are the answer to unfilled jobs?increase immigration to fill all those unfilled jobs.
Unlimited immigration is a ponzi scheme.increase immigration to fill all those unfilled jobs