- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 18,126
- Reaction score
- 2,743
- Country
Here is a comparison.Wrong.
Is a person lucky enough to own a million pound house (or a half million, or a quarter million) likely to be wealthier than a young family doomed to live out their days in rented accommodation? Paying rent to help the landlord buy a house, but unable ever to buy one of their own? And with nothing to show for a lifetime of paying rent?
There's something wrong with a country where a family can't buy a house.
But they can buy one for somebody else.
A 1 bed flat owned by me - value £250k
Monthly Rent £900 pm
Mortgage for a 250k loan £1,461 p/m
I could probably get £1,100
On top if they are the leaseholder, they have to pay
Landlords rip off building insurance £600 per year (paid by me)
Ground rend £100 per year
Management fee £1,100 per year.
Tell me how my tenants are better off owning rather than renting? Particularly if they took the money they save from not owning and ISA'd it in a nice stock ISA that returned a modest 9% a year. tax free.
They could buy this with what they saved after 15 years
Last edited: