Shots Fired Near Donny. Missed Again

Sponsored Links
He is not an idiot like truss

Or a dishonest incompetent liar like Johnson.

So, not the same.
I must agree, there may never ever be a PM as idiotic as Truss - truly exceptional, even for the torries

What a crap impression, is it meant to be satire? Just pathetic. I will laugh at funny stuff on either side of the political divide, but this is just dire
Indeedy,the left always seems to have problems crackin even the slightest smile - everything is soooo serious

But nevertheless, you have to acknowledge the sheer hypocrisy of starmer, esp if you recall the pious self righteous lecture he gave to Boris in 'cash for curtains'.,

And now we learn Starmers has been found to have breached Commons sleaze rules by failing to declare that Lord Waheed Alli, a Labour peer, paid for a personal shopper and outfits for Lady Victoria.
 
I must agree, there may never ever be a PM as idiotic as Truss - truly exceptional, even for the torries


Indeedy,the left always seems to have problems crackin even the slightest smile - everything is soooo serious

But nevertheless, you have to acknowledge the sheer hypocrisy of starmer, esp if you recall the pious self righteous lecture he gave to Boris in 'cash for curtains'.,

And now we learn Starmers has been found to have breached Commons sleaze rules by failing to declare that Lord Waheed Alli, a Labour peer, paid for a personal shopper and outfits for Lady Victoria.
Perhaps he should claim for the expenses instead.
Part B. Overall Processes and Rules
Chapter 1. The Process for Making Claims
Connected parties 3.20 For the purposes of this Scheme, a connected party is defined as: a. a spouse, civil partner or cohabiting partner of the MP;
 
Sponsored Links
IMO Kieth probably delayed disclosure because the issue would have been used as an example of sleaze at the election. It was likely a cynical decision to protect the party’s position politically, and his wifes personally. I dont buy the line that he disclosed after receiving updated advice. That is using the language of spin to divert from his failure to disclose. There will be an inquiry and like Borris, Kieth will probably be off the hook because it was an honest mistake. Unlike Borris at least Kieth cared about regularising the position. The torey’s are surely scoring an own goal by comparing Kieth to Borris but doubtless BJ’s fans will disagree.
 
IMO Kieth probably delayed disclosure because the issue would have been used as an example of sleaze at the election. It was likely a cynical decision to protect the party’s position politically, and his wifes personally. I dont buy the line that he disclosed after receiving updated advice. That is using the language of spin to divert from his failure to disclose. There will be an inquiry and like Borris, Kieth will probably be off the hook because it was an honest mistake. Unlike Borris at least Kieth cared about regularising the position. The torey’s are surely scoring an own goal by comparing Kieth to Borris but doubtless BJ’s fans will disagree.
You’ve been spending more time in Corbyn cultist echo chambers.

Silly cultists spend their time in Owen Jones Twitter account, posting about “Kieth” and giggling to each other.
 
Perhaps he should claim for the expenses instead.
yes, probably better. Then it would be more out in the open, we could then ask if the £5,000 for dresses could have been better spent on blankets for the elderly this winter ahead.

The bloke is on a massive salary, let him buy his wife's frocks

These donations from folk who then get favours stinks to high heaven, whether it be Boris or Starmer
 
But nevertheless, you have to acknowledge the sheer hypocrisy of starmer, esp if you recall the pious self righteous lecture he gave to Boris in 'cash for curtains'.,
false equivalence.

Boris Johnson was given over £100,000 and it was for a flat refurb not simply “curtains”
How much money was Mrs Starmer given?

What do you think somebody donating that much money to a prime minister wants in exchange.

As an aside, Victoria Starmer works in occupational health for the NHS, so is hardly on the gravy train
 
yes, probably better. Then it would be more out in the open, we could then ask if the £5,000 for dresses could have been better spent on blankets for the elderly this winter ahead.

The bloke is on a massive salary, let him buy his wife's frocks

These donations from folk who then get favours stinks to high heaven, whether it be Boris or Starmer
£5000

And you are claiming equivalence to over £100,000

Give yer head a shake mate
 
we could then ask if the £5,000 for dresses could have been better spent on blankets for the elderly this winter ahead
How many blankets would the £4b+ Tories spaffed up the wall on bogus PPE contracts to their mates, buy?
How many blankets would the £100b+ the Tories spaffed on Brexit buy?
How many blankets would the £200m the Tories spaffed on Michelle Mone buy?


Give yer head a shake
 
yes, probably better. Then it would be more out in the open, we could then ask if the £5,000 for dresses could have been better spent on blankets for the elderly this winter ahead.

The bloke is on a massive salary, let him buy his wife's frocks

These donations from folk who then get favours stinks to high heaven, whether it be Boris or Starmer
Since Sir Kier hasn't taken a pot-shot at the Donald i fail to see any relevance in this thread. Are you saying the shooter is privately funded by the Labour Party?
 
You’ve been spending more time in Corbyn cultist echo chambers.

Silly cultists spend their time in Owen Jones Twitter account, posting about “Kieth” and giggling to each other.
Kieth is in danger of making himself a cult, Borris was born one.
 
Yes I think Starmer should be eradicated, his WFA policy will condem a lot of pensioners to a cold miseable end this winter while he spunks our money on foreigners.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top