First?
Prior to what?
All the reports I've read suggests he saw an AK47 sticking out of the bushes.
First?
Prior to what?
What level of "Downing Street" pass. There's many levels of passes.He was given a Downing Street pass despite not having an official Govt position.
If drowning in the channel is not sufficient deterrent, then no amount of policy will deter them.Yes, The Tories made a pathetic play of controlling immigration. However, Two Tier has immediately dismantled some of the inadequate attempted policies to disuade migrants from chancing their arm in UK. Then he introduced a virtual amnesty for 100,000 migrants. Expect the illegal immigration problem to spiral out of control.
What level of "Downing Street" pass. There's many levels of passes.
What level was that?A level of pass that caused Two Tier embarrassment.
What level was that?
Starmer doesn't carry out the security clearances.
There is not a shred of evidence that the purchase of clothes resulted in favours.
He was given a Downing Street pass despite not having an official Govt position.
They're out of control and need a good slap down, the damn lot of 'em.
If I was in a position that required a high degree of security, I would expect my friends to be subject to security clearance, when they visit.
I would not expect to have to severe all ties with my social circle, because of my current vocation.
Not quite on the same level as "he should be eradicated", what?That sounds like an incitement to violence.
You're squirming now. I was obviously talking about the vocation of PM, and his social circle.Keith is unlikely to be inviting you to Downing St, and 'internet trolling' is hardly a vocation.
sounds like the kind of thing a weasel like you would say.That sounds like an incitement to violence.
The proposed policy change is generally fair, better off people dont need the allowance but as thatch found out with the poll tax it don't always work that way. It is unfair on the 800,000 or so elderly who are eligible for pension credit but don't claim it, they will lose out. It could be largely remedied by making householders in the lower council tax bands eligible. But the government cynically took that “saving” into account when calculating how much they would make. That is unfair.Yes I think Starmer should be eradicated, his WFA policy will condem a lot of pensioners to a cold miseable end this winter while he spunks our money on foreigners.