You have posted a pic that does not appear to be of protestors at the march.
Is that because you are a nitwit, or because you are a liar?
They’re dealing out swift justice to the rioters
- Thread starter Mottie
- Start date
You have posted a pic that does not appear to be of protestors at the march.
Is that because you are a nitwit, or because you are a liar?
Sponsored Links
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 18,395
- Reaction score
- 2,779
- Country
only in your head.
If the police don't release the suspect's details very soon, he's going to start wondering what they aren't telling us.
So are you then saying that putting this online is not a 'provocation of action or hatred'?
“Mass deportation now, set fire to all the f****** hotels full of the bastards for all I care…
"If that makes me racist, so be it.”
Sponsored Links
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 18,395
- Reaction score
- 2,779
- Country
No I haven't said that.
Why are you 'going to start wondering'?
It was only a couple of hours ago ffs!
And your stupid comment merely fuels speculation which other stupid people spread like wildfire!
So you are actually saying that her comments were illegal then?
Guess what...
Stupid people fuel other stupid people at times like these...
Because they don't think about the consequences!
- Joined
- 25 Jul 2022
- Messages
- 13,490
- Reaction score
- 1,070
- Country
You missed out burning buildings full of people.
I'm sure it just slipped your memory.
Now tell us how many police were injured in the riots?
Let's just get this all to scale
- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 18,395
- Reaction score
- 2,779
- Country
Lets be really clear because I know some of the forum members are a bit retarded, or pretend to be (not aiming that at you).
Her post in the context is clearly publishing material intending to stir up racial hatred, contrary to Section 19 of the Public Order Act 1986.
I do not believe there was a motive of hate as an aggravating factor and nothing in the CPS press release suggest they are pushing for sentence in line with an aggravated offence, should she be found guilty or plead guilty.
- Joined
- 25 Jul 2022
- Messages
- 13,490
- Reaction score
- 1,070
- Country
I read this too. Good to see the community acting......Ok just seen news flash 11year old girl and mum stabbed in london
Abdullah, 29, who works at TWG tea in Leicester Square, said he intervened to stop the attacker who had blood on his face and chest.
So how would you distinguish this case from the two already sentenced? Using the guidelines.
https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/R-v-Tyler-Kay-Sentencing-remarks.pdf
https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Jordan-Parlour.-Media-Posts.-Final.pdf
Racial hatred offences/ Hatred against persons on religious grounds or grounds of sexual orientation – Sentencing
www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk
As far as I can tell, hate crime wasn't actually added as a factor in the prosecution of the two men already sentenced. On the basis of reading those two sentences, it seem she is in line for the same sort of sentence if guilty.
Culpability will be category A, if there was "Intention to incite serious violence".
Harm could well be category 1 if her statement "directly encourages activity which threatens or endangers life".
and the aggravating factor is "Timing of incident – particularly sensitive social climate"
Last edited:
is it not better to charge them with whatever charges will place them in prison
then take there time securing other charges to be applied at a different date when enough evidence makes them watertight ......or doesnt it work that way
then take there time securing other charges to be applied at a different date when enough evidence makes them watertight ......or doesnt it work that way
Sponsored Links
