They’re dealing out swift justice to the rioters

I thank you for the bit in brackets :)

But I have to say that imo there is a bit of a contradiction in your post...

'publishing material intending to stir up racial hatred' is a hate crime and an aggravating factor...

Otherwise why would she have posted what she did?

Of course like some on here and other places, she could have had one too many...

But often that is when true feelings/believes can come out!

If you read the sentencing guide, they don't list hate as a possible aggravating factor for this crime. I think it's a red herring. To be charged with "stirring up racial hatred with hate" doesn't seem sensible to me.


1723485535645.png
 
Sponsored Links
Inciting race crimes through malice Vs through stupidity?

The woman who kicked off the Farage Riots is a long standing conspiracy theorist and anti-vaxer.
 
If you read the sentencing guide, they don't list hate as a possible aggravating factor for this crime. I think it's a red herring. To be charged with "stirring up racial hatred with hate" doesn't seem sensible to me.


View attachment 351986
But you seem to have omitted the 'vulnerable/impressionable audience' bit...

And the 'Timing of incident - particularly sensitive social climate'...

Which of those doesn't apply to the current climate of racially motivated riots?
 
Of course like some on here and other places, she could have had one too many...

But often that is when true feelings/beliefs can come out!

There are some crimes where being too drunk to form the required intent is a defence.
 
Sponsored Links
But you seem to have omitted the 'vulnerable/impressionable audience' bit...

And the 'Timing of incident - particularly sensitive social climate'...

Which of those doesn't apply to the current climate of racially motivated riots?

I was purely talking about whether hate could be an aggravating factor for this offence

In both of the far right riot cases decided so far "Timing of incident - particularly sensitive social climate" was found to be an aggravating factor.
 
That depends on whether the intoxication is voluntary or involuntary!

I was actually only meaning voluntary intoxication, and was wondering whether that might theoretically be a potential defence in a case like this.
 
I was actually only meaning voluntary intoxication, and was wondering whether that might theoretically be a potential defence in a case like this.
Like maybe the Councillor said to his wife, 'have another one before you go online'?
 
Like maybe the Councillor said to his wife, 'have another one before you go online'?

Not specifically. There are all sorts of ways a drunk person could end up being online and posting something they don't even remember.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top