where in the article does it say the treasury are reconsidering?Righto
come on, lets see you quote the actual part
where in the article does it say the treasury are reconsidering?Righto
I suggest you do some research to see how an estate worth say £20m would be impact under labours proposed changes.Receiving a large amount of money, and paying some tax on it, does not bankrupt anybody.
It leaves them richer than they were before.
BBC are a Tory mouthpiece. Is nonsense.where in the article does it say the treasury are reconsidering?
come on, lets see you quote the actual part
Define ordinary working person?ordinary working people pay income tax
rich people earn money by return on assets..........its perfectly acceptable for the tax rate to be the same
but of course Motorbiking wants poor people to pay more tax than rich
I suggest you do some research
Just what are those. Give me a list.labours proposed changes.
That is true. However in this particular case they know that the treasury would not make a statement like this - illustrated by them asking directly..BBC are a Tory mouthpiece. Is nonsense.
…if you leave the U.K. you mean. As so many are doing.Receiving a large inheritance does not bankrupt you.
Ministers are being asked to draw up billions of pounds in cuts to infrastructure projects over the next 18 months despite Rachel Reeves pledging to invest more to grow the economy, the Guardian has learned.Just what are those. Give me a list.
That is true. However in this particular case they know that the treasury would not make a statement like this - illustrated by them asking directly..
…if you leave the U.K.
HMRC recognises this as an issue, particularly where an estate is largely made up of property which also cannot be liquidated easily, and allow IHT to be deferred for 10 years.I’ll take that as.. you have looked and now realise the issue someone would face having to settle inheritance on business assets that cannot easily be liquidated within the time frame.
All Labour said in their manifesto about it was to ‘end the use of offshore trusts to avoid inheritance tax‘. Some like to imagine the rest and make up policies where there are none.Just what are those. Give me a list.
and this is what they intend to change according to many in the industry. Not to mention the deferral is subject to interest.HMRC recognises this as an issue, particularly where an estate is largely made up of property which also cannot be liquidated easily, and allow IHT to be deferred for 10 years.
That’s probably enough time to sort out business assets, even at £20M.
People like tax advisors you mean.All Labour said in their manifesto about it was to ‘end the use of offshore trusts to avoid inheritance tax‘. Some like to imagine the rest and make up policies where there are none.