Ukraine counter offensive

No they aren't.
Yes they are.
The alternative is to accept that British only ever bred between themselves.
If you look back at the population of UK, say about 1200 AD, when the population of UK was about 3 million, then you'd probably be marrying your first cousin.

Assuming a generation is about 25 years, then going back to about 1500 AD, you would have had about 500,000 parents, grand parents, great grand parents, great great grand parents, etc, ad infinitum.

Going back to about 1400 AD, you would have had about 8million parents, grand parents, great grand parents, great great grand parents, etc.
So for the British to not have interbred with other nations, and of course France is the nearest, then there would have been an awful lot of incest going on.

It's just maths.
 
Last edited:
Sponsored Links
The British are actually French, and the French actually British.

One could extrapolate further and suggest that racists are more mutated imperfectly.
Whereas non-racists, especially those that partner up with people from far-away lands, are less likely to be mutated imperfectly.

I'm quite happy to expand this further, and we can do that easily with mathematics.

Total Nonsense and rubbish :ROFLMAO:
 
What has all this got to do with the Ukraine war? take it elsewhere.
You mean all the comments about France had nothing to do with the Ukraine war.
Strange you didn't object several pages ago, cousin.
 
Last edited:
Sponsored Links
You mean all the comments about France had nothing to do with the Ukraine war.
Strange you didn't object several pages ago, cousin.
It could be i didn't have the foresight then, several pages later of the same drivel is enough.
 
Cousin ? You need to take that into a certain community where bye marrying there cousins seems to be or is the norm ;)
Go back about 600 years then we all had about 2 to the power of 24 forefathers, (based on a generation being about 25 years, so about 4 generations per 100 years) that's about 16,000,000 forefathers (and mothers, of course :rolleyes:) that each of us had. That's maybe enough forefathers for each one of us, equivalent to the whole population of Europe at that time.
Because we all could not possible have had that number of forefathers each, it is obvious that we are all inter-related to varying degrees, and we all shared some of those forefathers, and subsequent generations.
The more racist you are, the less likely it is that you would marry someone of another ethnicity, and the more likely you are to be more closely related to your partner.
Whereas non-racists might be more attracted to partners of a different ethnicity, and therefore less likely to be closely related to their partner.

It's just maths.

But I don't expect you to be able to understand it and you'll probably reply with some gobbledygook nonsense.

But take it from me, if you go back about 800 years (remember now 2 to the power of 32), each of us would have about 4.25 Billion forefathers. So ignoring intermarrying cousins, etc, one person would have probably the equivalent of the population of the planet as it was at that time.
 
Learn to read thicko.
Resorting to abuse because your reasoning is exhausted? Tut, tut.

You admitted that suddenly you decided that you thought my comments were not relevant, but all the previous ones along similar lines didn't motivate you to consider the posts weren't relative.
As I said, it appears to be the poster, not the post that motivated your objection.
Or perhaps you were concerned that my comments were a little too pragmatic, and proved such previous anti-foreigner comments as prejudiced nonsense.
 
Last edited:
Time for a new thread I guess.
I'm quite happy to discuss the concept of us all being closely related, more so than others.
But the basic tenet that British are actually French, and vice-versa is relevant to this thread, due to the excessive amounts of anti-foreigner sentiment.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top