Ukraine counter offensive

It is what is known as Geopolitics.
Nations don't have friends, they have only interests.
But...but, i thought America was our friend. Our bestest buddy. BFFE.
We have a 'Special Relationship'.

Explain to me more about this Geopollyticks you speak of...
 
Sponsored Links
by the way America dropped the bomb on Hiroshima whilst it was engaged in a world war, it stopped the war
It didn't stop the war.
Most Japanese were not aware that nuclear bombs had been dropped.
It was the Russian declaration of war on Japan that forced the Japanese to surrender.

Quote..
Nuclear weapons shocked Japan into surrendering at the end of World War II—except they didn't. Japan surrendered because the Soviet Union entered the war. Japanese leaders said the bomb forced them to surrender because it was less embarrassing to say they had been defeated by a miracle weapon.
 
Quote1

The Soviet Union declared war the moment they saw Japan was defeated, and quickly seized territory and islands before it was all over.

They started their war a few days AFTER the Hiroshima bomb

They invaded the Kuril Islands AFTER Japan had announced its surrender, and expelled the Japanese inhabitants


Quote2:

Vinty the Stalinist posts a lot of nonsense.
 
Sponsored Links
It is always easy to find evidence of Russian bad behaviour but it seems to be quite difficult to find any evidence of Ukrainian bad behavior.
Why is this?

Is it because Russia invaded Ukraine?

And Ukraine didn't invade Russia?

Two facts you pretend not to know
 
In a poll in Russia a good while back the majority saw uncle Joe stalin as a stand up bloke

Putin clamped down on organisations that were informing people of stalins failures

His purges
Gulags
Mass executions

Ect ect

Putin is probably invoking some of uncle joes methods
 
Maybe Vinty lives in Russia.

It would explain his sources of information.
 
You need an answer to this?
The answer appears quite simple.
Only Russians commit atrocities.
If the Americans or their allies bomb an orphanage anywhere in the world it is generally referred to by the media as a tragedy.
When Russia or its allies bomb an orphanage anywhere in the world it is referred to by the media as an atrocity.
That appears to be the reason only Russia commits war crimes.
 
The answer appears quite simple.
Only Russians commit atrocities.
If the Americans or their allies bomb an orphanage anywhere in the world it is generally referred to by the media as a tragedy.
When Russia or its allies bomb an orphanage anywhere in the world it is referred to by the media as an atrocity.
That appears to be the reason only Russia commits war crimes.
Im glad you see it so simply. It must help
 
Quote1

The Soviet Union declared war the moment they saw Japan was defeated, and quickly seized territory and islands before it was all over.

They started their war a few days AFTER the Hiroshima bomb

They invaded the Kuril Islands AFTER Japan had announced its surrender, and expelled the Japanese inhabitants


Quote2:

Vinty the Stalinist posts a lot of nonsense.
You are correct that the Soviets declared war after Hiroshima but the Japanese didn't surrender after Hiroshima either.
They surrendered after the Russians declared war on them.
Quote.
Look at the facts. The United States bombed 68 cities in the summer of 1945. If you graph the number of people killed in all 68 of those attacks, you imagine that Hiroshima is off the charts, because that’s the way it’s usually presented. In fact, Hiroshima is second. Tokyo, a conventional attack, is first in the number killed. If you graph the number of square miles destroyed, Hiroshima is sixth. If you graph the percentage of the city destroyed, Hiroshima is 17th
 
The answer appears quite simple.
Only Russians commit atrocities.
If the Americans or their allies bomb an orphanage anywhere in the world it is generally referred to by the media as a tragedy.
When Russia or its allies bomb an orphanage anywhere in the world it is referred to by the media as an atrocity.
That appears to be the reason only Russia commits war crimes.
If you weren't utterly wrong you'd have a point.

There was a video of a Ukrainian soldier apparently mutilating and killing a PoW a while back. The Ukrainian defense minister responded that it will be investigated and if true the offender would be punished.

This was around the time Ukraine had retaken one of their towns where Russian troops had executed civilians. The Russian defense secretary said that it was all a fake.

1) Ukraine has been accused of war crimes.
2) Russia has had far more opportunity to commit crimes against civilians. And there's a **** load of evidence of them.
3) When Russia has claimed war crimes the evidence is spotty or occasionally badly faked. There must be some real ones but Russia lies so often and so badly it's hard to tell when they aren't.
4) Russian doctrine includes various war crimes as part of making war. It has been seen in every way they have been engaged in for the last two decades. It is how they fight.

Assuming some level of equivalence is a mistake.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top