Well, that went well didn’t it?

[noseall]

You have invented a scenario of being guilty of causing a riot and are now trying to fit it in to the offence of rioting.

A police officer assaults an innocent black man due to mistaken identity, the outrage causes a riot.

A politician makes a provocative speech which triggers a protest. The protest turns in to a riot.

A journalist incorrectly reports on a story which causes public anger which turns in to a riot.

All 3 have caused a riot. None are guilty of sec 1 public order - rioting.

The scenario was (in your original post) that the perp' was guilty. You asked about stiffer sentences.

So on that basis I asked you a yes/no question in a similar capacity, to which you floundered and waffled.

The perp is guilty of inciting a riot. Should they be jailed? Yes/no?

It really is not that difficult (to play your game) boyo.

 

[motorbiking]

Inciting. Finally. Not the same as causing obviously.

Someone who incites a riot is guilty of a very serious offence. Yes they should go to prison.

Do you think someone who posts stupid racism on twitter is guilty of inciting a riot?

Do you think the same person should go to prison for longer than someone convicted of robbery while in possession of a knife. (Armed robbery). ?

 

[noseall]

Do you think it makes you look clever by asking closed questions, or can you not think of other options?

He thinks it makes him look clever and informed.

Rather, he just comes across exactly like the woman hating dick that he is.