The point I made is that if a pensioner has a valuable asset that they got at a vastly subsidised price, why should they be entitled to the wfa .
Exactly, you wish to force them out by indirect means, disgraceful.
The point I made is that if a pensioner has a valuable asset that they got at a vastly subsidised price, why should they be entitled to the wfa .
They could take in lodgers, help pay their costs.Exactly, you wish to force them out by indirect means, disgraceful.
If your home is worth £1M, and you have no savings, you are reliant entirely on income - the pension. Over the limit, you will receive very little in the way of financial concessions. The £1M home will also likely need lots of expensive work to be done upon it, just to keep it in an habitable state. I often see such homes, on Homes Under the Hammer, where the owner has passed away.
The UK pension is one of the worst in Europe. The pensioners of the UK deserve better, than penny-pinching by government.
It appears you do not know the eligibility rules for Pension Credit.
Let me help you.
The leading Labour MP against the move does not see it that way. She realises that the costs of WFA need to be reduced.He's gotta u turn on this. It's worse than the recent tory embarrassments. Well worn reference to Mick and Elton ?
Then you will know that ownership of a million-pound house does not disqualify you from Pension Credit, nor the other benefits it gives access to, nor the WFA.Thank you, John, I know the rules, well enough..
If your home is worth £1M, and you have no savings, you are reliant entirely on income - the pension. Over the limit, you will receive very little in the way of financial concessions.
The £1M home will also likely need lots of expensive work to be done upon it, just to keep it in an habitable state
So what?but selling off council housing, made little or no difference to the amount overall
I want those that need it to get it. I have never known any pensioner in a millionaire household be forced to sell because they lost less than £4 a week.Exactly, you wish to force them out by indirect means, disgraceful.
I want those that need it to get it. I have never known any pensioner in a millionaire household be forced to sell because they lost less than £4 a week.
Which lots of needy people suffer.Or almost double that, if you include the TV licence, then there is all the inflation, on top.
If the people living in them who bought them, didn't buy them, they'd still be in them, renting them.So what?
RTB is directly responsible for the loss of 2m social housing stock. It doesn't help over 1m households who are on council and HA waiting lists to say "don't worry, Mr and Mrs Smith got a nice cheap house, now worth a small fortune, stop moaning."
RTB is directly responsible for the loss of 2m social housing stock.
Just how far towards communism, do you lean.
It's an interesting, but crazy, fantasy that providing decent social housing is an act of communism.
I think it just shows how political blind Starmer and Reeves and their cabinet are
We’ll all be paying for their idiotic moves