- Joined
- 25 Jul 2022
- Messages
- 12,510
- Reaction score
- 982
- Country
Reducing anybodys pay is Dickensian, I agreeApparently its Dickensian to reduce the pay of over paid staff.
Reducing anybodys pay is Dickensian, I agreeApparently its Dickensian to reduce the pay of over paid staff.
What about the Bus driver, why shouldn't he earn the same as the train driver or the Marine Pilot, with vastly greater responsibility. Both of those have to steer.
£200k a year? Wow...Worth treble what they pay train drivers
A recent report said the average train driver was 46 years old, male and white.
Probably a shortage of those in London then.
Labour received significantly less from trade unions than it did in the 2015, 2017 and 2019 elections.Of course and the Unions want their money for loyally supporting Labour.
And we get back to why we need unions.Of course and the Unions want their money for loyally supporting Labour.
literally talking nonsense.And we get back to why we need unions.
People like mbk want to sack anybody for any reason. Including somebody who turns up and says " I will do that job for less"
I'm quoting your own words.People are generally opting out of union membership..
literally talking nonsense.
Why do the top earners have the least secure jobs.
It's for the employee to turn it to his advantage, so that the next employer is saying "I will pay you more if you join me".
If you don't earn enough - the only person who can do something about it, is you.
no you're very confused as usual.
What would you do if you wanted more money for y
Who is confused?No I'm suggesting market forces dictate pay.
I'm happy for my boss to sack me if he can find someone who can do it better for less. I am also happy that I can leave, if I can find an employer who will be paying me more for the same.