Angela Rayner

Sponsored Links
except she was married and therefore subject to the one home rule

An interesting development. The Guardian claims to have seen a recent document from HMRC, in which they accept that the house owned by Angela Rayner was her main residence throughout.

The tax authority said two weeks ago it had considered the evidence and had concluded the house in Stockport was the Labour deputy leader’s principal residence the whole time she owned it, meaning no tax would be due.

 
Sponsored Links
GMP say there's no criminality.
HMRC says there's no CGT owed.

Can everyone stop hating her now?
 
The GMP say there was a public interest in investigating the complaints, but only conclude it wasn't a police matter after commencing the investigation instead of before. Then pass the ball to HMRC and Stockport Council who weren't looking into it anyway. Maybe a principal residence election came to light.
 
An interesting development. The Guardian claims to have seen a recent document from HMRC, in which they accept that the house owned by Angela Rayner was her main residence throughout.




Obviously motorbiking must also have seen that evidence.

How could he deliver his verdict without seeing the evidence?

Only an idiot would do that.
 
The GMP say there was a public interest in investigating the complaints, but only conclude it wasn't a police matter after commencing the investigation instead of before. Then pass the ball to HMRC and Stockport Council who weren't looking into it anyway. Maybe a principal residence election came to light.
Is that your way of saying a Tory snitched her to the rozzers, there was a thorough investigation and no wrongdoing was found? And subsequently, the council and the HMRC found no wrongdoing either? Perhaps you meant to write 'complete a thorough investigation' rather than 'commence'.

Easy mistake to make. (y)
 
Is that your way of saying a Tory snitched her to the rozzers, there was a thorough investigation and no wrongdoing was found? And subsequently, the council and the HMRC found no wrongdoing either? Perhaps you meant to write 'complete a thorough investigation' rather than 'commence'.

Easy mistake to make. (y)
The police wrongly succumbed to political pressure.
 
The police wrongly succumbed to political pressure.
They were leant on heavily.

I bet the police had a little meeting and decided here’s what we do “announce to the public we are investigating it while we actually don’t waste our time on it, diary it for 6 weeks then announce NFA”
 
The police shuffled paper clips. That much is clear and the guardian won’t publish what they claim to have seen. Is it because the tax was paid?
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top