- Joined
- 25 Jul 2022
- Messages
- 12,357
- Reaction score
- 968
- Country
You carry on with your Tory tropes.You have such a 2D way of thinking.
Demand: The first thing you need to look at is if there is demand for better skilled workers and if those roles pay more. yes there is.
Supply: You then need to look at how many in work families are in poverty. The number has fallen according to some data from 2017/18 to 22/23, but I suspect, many given the right help would want to earn more and be more valuable.
Potential: You then look to see if you can elevate some of those people in the supply group to meet the demand group. What training do they need etc. let's assume we can take 20% of the 20% and move them from minimum wage to avg wage. That is more than the money raised taxing private schools or private jets.
For "essential" work that is low paid, you have to ask why is it low paid? is it a low skill job with 100s of candidates willing to do the work?
In which case, how's that going to work with a 20% reduction in available workforce. The employer is then forced to pay more and/or innovate to improve productivity.
That is no reason why they shouldn't be paid a decent wage for a decent days work. No body is saying they should be paid as much as a rocket scientist.