Good old Coutts

Status
Not open for further replies.
People traffickers cause it. And nobody is blaming the rnli volunteers.

The claim is that they are being used as an illegal migrant taxi service. It is indisputable given their AIS data and marine radio traffic
Yet again! Presence at a geographical location does not prove complicity, otherwise the police would be considered complicit in every crime scene that they attend.
 
Sponsored Links
Imagine when all the banks sing from the same hymn sheet
So if one bank is offering 6.5% interest on savings, they all are?
That's useful to know.
How come many aren't singing from the same hymn sheet?
 
Good old Nige' has commenced proceedings for damages.

You mean he's sent a solicitor's letter?
"so I have today sent a legal litigation letter to Coutts"

I suspect they have solicitors of their own.
 
Think you need to look at your own logic. Should you not be looking at Coutts part they played in giving him the opportunity.
40 page defamation dossiers are not a good look for a bank with well heeled customers.
Defamation dossier, lol. It was balanced and objective in tone and has been consistently mis reported. Eg employees of the bank said he was a dis ingenuos griffter, no the report said he is regarded by many as such. And our nige published it.

Good old nige

Blup
 
Sponsored Links
@Roy Bloom Hello Himmy, welcome back. I'm not going over old ground with you, via multiple replies.
- boat sets off in unsafe condition.
- French coastguard monitor and occasionally offer assistance, escorting them to the edge of French waters.
- Upon arrival safely in UK waters, they contact RNLI who arrive to taxi them back to the UK.
- They do this to avoid the skipper being identified.
- They do not want help from the French because they know that is a taxi back to France.
- they are happy to risk their lives while in French waters, but demand rescue once they have crossed.

Most people donate to the RNLI because they offer rescue of sea fearers who due to misfortune have run into difficulty. Until they got involved in migrant taxi services, the vast majority of people being rescued were people who did not knowingly set off in unsafe vessels, expecting a free ride. Donations have not kept up with inflation despite the media hype that they were several 1000% up as a result of the so called anti-RNLI campaign from the so called RW.

Nearest ship is usually always tasked with rescue, unless it's more practical to task a dedicated rescue. Every vessel able to help has a duty to help. French warships/coast guard are usually close, but their help will always be refused.

There is no magic Bermuda Triangle in the middle of the English Channel that causes boats to start sinking. The illegal migrants know they only have to get half way and they will get a free £multi-million Uber.
 
Defamation dossier, lol. It was balanced and objective in tone and has been consistently mis reported. Eg employees of the bank said he was a dis ingenuos griffter, no the report said he is regarded by many as such. And our nige published it.

Good old nige

Blup
did you read all of it? Did you spot where the author stops citing 3rd party source and starts adding defamatory commentary? Did you see how media opinion is presented as legitimate source and then there is a conclusion inferred.

For example

XX is Peodo
On the allegation that XX is a pedo, reported in X & Y, we found no evidence that XX is a pedo, though it is right to consider these sources. That is as good as calling XX a pedo from a defamation pov.
 
@Roy Bloom Hello Himmy, welcome back. I'm not going over old ground with you, via multiple replies.
Why do so many posters resort to the usual: "go figure", "I've told you already", "look it up yourself", "read the judgement", etc, etc, whenever they're put on the spot to justify their claims.

They continue to pump out the usual garbage from the usual garbage creators.

You claimed Farage had been defamed, etc, yet you refuse to post the evidence that you claim exists.

Evidence that a boat was in a geographical location at some point in time does not prove that any kind of coordination between French and UK boats existed or occured, as claimed by you:

The claim is that they are being used as an illegal migrant taxi service. It is indisputable given their AIS data and marine radio traffic
What else are they doing rendezvousing with French patrols back n forth back n forth. Out to the half way point. And back again. And then back again.
 
Last edited:
They have publicly stated that over 21% of the people rescued are boat people, given that their assets are distributed around the country and probably less than 10% are in range, that is £40M of their costs going on migrant taxi services. It would be vastly cheaper to buy each illegal migrant a nice apartment in calais.
 
Coutts are not signed up to ESG.
Only HSBC, as a UK based bank are signed up to ESG.
Alison Rose "Green Leader of the Year", chair of UK Gov energy efficiency task force, "The chief executive of NatWest has overseen a pivot towards saving the planet and LGBT rights since taking the helm" (Telegraph) .... climate agenda, black history month ....
So Coutts's reputation is no longer ... it is a 300 year of bank with lots of history ... .that is irrelvant.
What is relevant is what the "thought-leaders" at the W.E.F say : https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/06/esg-resilience-investment-environment-social-governance/

Ultimately these kinds of people just do what they think is fashionable, and then take the money. Which is why the West is losing its shine, inflation.
Problem is you can only sell the kitchen silver and be fashionable .... you can only do that for so long.
 
This tells us a different story than the one Bobby Dazzler would have us believe. What is the motive behind Bobby not giving us the true picture.

 
They have publicly stated that over 21% of the people rescued are boat people, given that their assets are distributed around the country and probably less than 10% are in range, that is £40M of their costs going on migrant taxi services. It would be vastly cheaper to buy each illegal migrant a nice apartment in calais.
In operating a rescue service the plight, and how the seafarers came to be in that plight is secondary.
The primary and overriding concern is that they need rescuing. Their safety is paramount and any mitgating factor has no bearing.

The French (or any other navy) is not bound by the same raison d'etre as the RNLI.
 
Nigel was wrong to call it a taxi service. It’s a ****ing courtesy coach!
Well someone should tell them not to respond to emergency calls then. It's quite simple.
 
- boat sets off in unsafe condition.
- French coastguard monitor and occasionally offer assistance, escorting them to the edge of French waters.
- Upon arrival safely in UK waters, they contact RNLI who arrive to taxi them back to the UK.
- They do this to avoid the skipper being identified.
- They do not want help from the French because they know that is a taxi back to France.
- they are happy to risk their lives while in French waters, but demand rescue once they have crossed.
Do the government know all this? Why are they turning a blind eye?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
Back
Top