- Status
Sponsored Links
Making things up by numbers old as the hills.Assuming there are 66,000,000 people in UK, and that half of them are females, I'd say that 10% of 33,000,000 (that'll be about 3,000,000 females that are potentially infertile) is many, wouldn't you?
That's a extremely rough estimate and doesn't take account for prepubescent females who are obviously not yet fertile, and the many older females who are past child bearing age, who are also infertile.
It also doesn't take account of women who choose to be childless.
An online survey of UK women’s attitudes to having children, the age they want children and the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic
AbstractSTUDY QUESTION. What are women’s views on having children, including the age they want to have them and other influences such as the coronavirus diacademic.oup.com
I see you're suffering from it.
When you find out what the treatment is, be sure to let gant know.
I did say it was an extremely rough estimate, but made up, no, absolutrely not.
The 10% was taken from a university project. If you'd checked the source of my figure, you'd have realised that.
I'm also assuming you'd agree with my figure of 66,000,000 people in UK?
Try the calculation yourself, 50% of 66,000,000 = 33,000,000
10% of 33,000,000= 3,000,000
That's the extremely rough estimate of infertile women in the UK. That's many women.
But it doesn't take into account of other factors previously mentioned.
Sponsored Links
IRONY OVERLOAD!!!
The only time you don't have the last word is either if you get yourself banned, or the thread is locked before you've got your oar in
D
Deleted member 221031
Roy you’ve been bested consistently. You’ve not made a point and won’t answer questions.Yep!
It's descended into a pantomime.
He's behind youuuu!!!
Hasn't it, children?
You’re a sad little man who probably wears a dress.
D
Deleted member 221031
That time I got the last post in Roy! Then the thread got locked. LolIRONY OVERLOAD!!!
The only time you don't have the last word is either if you get yourself banned, or the thread is locked before you've got your oar in
You know what's wrong with them figures 50% of 66 million a glaring discrepancy. Which is obvious to many even to yourself but there's nowt like being economical with the truth eh.I did say it was an extremely rough estimate, but made up, no, absolutrely not.
The 10% was taken from a university project. If you'd checked the source of my figure, you'd have realised that.
I'm also assuming you'd agree with my figure of 66,000,000 people in UK?
Try the calculation yourself, 50% of 66,000,000 = 33,000,000
10% of 33,000,000= 3,000,000
That's the extremely rough estimate of infertile women in the UK. That's many women.
But it doesn't take into account of other factors previously mentioned.
I se you like to have a stab at having the last word as well.IRONY OVERLOAD!!!
The only time you don't have the last word is either if you get yourself banned, or the thread is locked before you've got your oar in
There's a difference between not answering questions and not responding to your demands.
You might not understand the difference. That's your problem.
And you felt proud of that moment.
Precisely what is your point.
Do you not agree that 50% of 66,000,000 is 33,000,000?
Or do you have a problem with me estimating that 50% of the population are females?
What exactly do you think is the glaring discrepancy?
What is your idea of many?
You not know what the glaring discrepancy was. No surprise you made such a claim then.
No! That's why I asked you to tell me!
Remember?
Precisely what is your point.
Do you not agree that 50% of 66,000,000 is 33,000,000?
Or do you have a problem with me estimating that 50% of the population are females?
What exactly do you think is the glaring discrepancy?
What is your idea of many?
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 16,581
- Reaction score
- 2,337
- Country
You must be new here...No! That's why I asked you to tell me!
- Status
Sponsored Links
