Sponsored Links
Evidently none of them have died from it.
So much better than being unprotected and getting the disease.
It has been used somewhere north of 2.5 Billion times. It has not been banned in any countries and while there are extremely rare serious side effects, they're extremely rare.
It's a very good vaccine.
Just as you have to pay for roads, hospitals, schools and prisons whether you use them or not. It's called society.
Sponsored Links
Antivaxxers trying to keep the rumour pot boiling by throwing in vague nonsense.
Gandalf the Grey's Anatomy.
D
Deleted member 18243
No Charlie, it's called a scam. Hundreds of billions of our money has been given to con men and women, never to be returned and with nothing to show for it. With roads; hospitals; schools and prisons we have something of lasting value.
In your world, in your weird opinion - the rest of us value our health, lives, and the part the jab has played in preserving them.
There are few vaccines that don't impart side effects.
D
Deleted member 18243
You're a Yorkshire man Harry. Have you seen that in the hills above Hebden Bridge some of the minor roads have been closed for a few years? They are not being repaired as there isn't the money. They are not important roads but good to have. The people of Skipton and Colne want the railway reinstated, it would cost billions but is feasible. Not a national emergency but useful to many. In London they recently opened the Elizabeth Line, which took over a decade to build and cost £18 billions - good value and something that will last for years.
Test and Trace cost £37 billions, achieved nothing and was abandoned after a few months. The money is gone forever.
Jab junkies are trying to keep the myth going about those who choose not to take 'virus' jabs...
They don't seem to understand that whilst a person may wish not to have a particular vaccine (despite having other vaccines), it does not make them an 'antivaxxer'...
So maybe the jab junkies have an insecurity issue about the choice they made, and lash out at those who make a different choice?
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 17,669
- Reaction score
- 2,422
- Country
Sorted,
So maybe the antivaxxers have an insecurity issue about the choice they made, and lash out at those who make a different choice?
As far as I'm concerned it's totally the opposite
I'm not an 'antivaxxer' by the way
But as time goes by, concerns about the 'virus' jabs are being shown not to be unfounded...
Who knows what future revelations will show
Sponsored Links
Similar threads
- Locked
- teaboyjim
- General Discussion
