Labour Conference

Boris is a globalist so it's hard not to have him in a discussion about globalism.

I thought Brexit was about trading with the rest of the world ergo global.
Never seen you post in that context, usually it's all about Yahboo politics
 
Sponsored Links
Thank fook for that.

It would be scary if you'd actually put some thought into your posts.
I'm sure we have our differences, but sometimes I do like your style.
I remember once, having a lively but good natured discussion, in person, in a moderately szied group of people, alcohol was available.
I gave my opinon about something, I can't remember what the discussion was about.
Someone who had been quiet up to that point, and was normaly considered ambivalent, said, "yeah, but you're a *****".
It was so out of character it was really funny.
 
Impossible for Labour to win a GE in the UK then.
Obviously there's ongoing support from happy-clappy types who think it would be lovely if everyone was lovely, and don't really think much beyond that, can forgive the odd illegal invasion, them and their parents always voted for them and just hate the other lot.

But Labour gains massive support from younger voters. They always get more support every year while they're out of office, as they promise the earth and seem like the "nice" party. If people didn't experience their last attempt at running the country then they're vastly more likely to vote for them.

I've been along this learning curve myself. I grew up in Thatcher's cruel Britain. Couldn't understand why anyone voted for the nasty party, seemed obvious that the nice lot should run the country. I was part of the wide-eyed innocent public that voted the lying war criminal and his cronies into power, thinking that "Things can only get better".

A few years later... pretty much no industry left, nobody can afford a house, public spending completely out of control while services don't improve and the former working classes are being bribed with handouts paid from borrowed money to keep voting for more of the same.

Labour trashed the country's future and does not serve the working classes.
 
Sponsored Links
A few years later... pretty much no industry left, nobody can afford a house, public spending completely out of control while services don't improve and the former working classes are being bribed with handouts paid from borrowed money to keep voting for more of the same.

Yep.

Tories trashed the country's future and do not serve the working classes.
 
Obviously there's ongoing support from happy-clappy types who think it would be lovely if everyone was lovely, and don't really think much beyond that, can forgive the odd illegal invasion, them and their parents always voted for them and just hate the other lot.

But Labour gains massive support from younger voters. They always get more support every year while they're out of office, as they promise the earth and seem like the "nice" party. If people didn't experience their last attempt at running the country then they're vastly more likely to vote for them.

I've been along this learning curve myself. I grew up in Thatcher's cruel Britain. Couldn't understand why anyone voted for the nasty party, seemed obvious that the nice lot should run the country. I was part of the wide-eyed innocent public that voted the lying war criminal and his cronies into power, thinking that "Things can only get better".

A few years later... pretty much no industry left, nobody can afford a house, public spending completely out of control while services don't improve and the former working classes are being bribed with handouts paid from borrowed money to keep voting for more of the same.

Labour trashed the country's future and does not serve the working classes.
This is the quote I think your looking for.


 
This is the quote I think your looking for.

That's a corruption of the original, from a French academic:
“Celui qui n'est pas républicain à vingt ans fait douter de la générosité de son âme¹; mais celui qui, après trente ans, persévère, fait douter de la rectitude de son esprit.”
“He who is not a républicain at twenty compels one to doubt the generosity of his heart; but he who, after thirty, persists, compels one to doubt the soundness of his mind.” Anselme Polycarpe Batbie (19th century academic jurist).

it seems to have originated with Batbie, who was referring to the changing political positions of Edmund Burke.

Edmund Burke was an Irish statesman.

¹I would have translated "son âme" as his soul.
 
If people didn't experience their last attempt at running the country then they're vastly more likely to vote for them
Blair period in power:
Lower child poverty
Lower pensioner poverty
Steady growth
Lowest NHS waiting times in history
Dr's appointment in 48hrs, now 3 weeks
Increased number of nurses
More police
Lower class sizes
Sure start

It was far better than Tories since
 
Labour created benefit dependency, to ensure the former working classes kept voting for them.

They did very little to encourage or retain industry, in fact the opposite. Among other issues, the housing market boom they openly patted themselves on the back for directly led to many viable businesses being shut down and demolished to build houses, as the rewards for closing a business became greater than those for staying in business (even if profitable).

They spewed money at the NHS, much of it off the books, e.g. all the dodgy PFI deals. It would be ridiculous if things hadn't improved, of course they did, but whether it was all good value is another issue. The NHS will drink as much money as can be thrown at it and it will still want more. The tories have increased its budget every year well above inflation, there have not been any cuts, those in the labour party suggesting this are outright liars. The biggest issue the NHS has had (among many) is from the covid panto, for which Labour backed every reckless decision made by the tories, basically shutting it down for over a year.

You're creating a false dichotomy, that everyone who doesn't think the sun shines out of Starmer's arse is a Tory fanatic. That's simply not the case, you have a caricatured simplistic view of the world.

My point is definitely not that the tories are wonderful - they're terrible. But that the sort of pant-wetting excitement at Labour's announcements seen on this thread is absolutely definitely going to become disappointment once the reality of them getting in becomes clear.

Labour is very likely to win the next election. Most are apathetic about it, sadly a few misguided fools actually believe that life's going to be all sunshine and flowers after. It won't be, it will be pretty similar to now, mostly because the country's completely broke due to two decades of utter incompetence and deceit by BOTH parties, so they will be prevented from doing almost all of it or will be forced to raise taxes way above what they now are.

Most people will find out that they are "the rich" that are being targeted - socialism is great until you run out of someone else's money.
 
Labour created benefit dependency, to ensure the former working classes kept voting for them
No they didn’t.

Labour reduced the numbers unemployed for most of its period in office and it tightened medical checks for those on incapacity benefits. It also introduced jobcentre interviews

I notice Ivor spends his time posting uninformed bias
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top