D
Deleted member 174758
Sorry, but that conflicts with a lot of stuff coming out of Belarus itself. There are five main symbols which have been seen on vehicles, "Z", "V", "O", "X" and "Z" inside a square box.Belarus has been engaged but not mentioned of late. Their mobile stuff shows a V rather than a Z. The V's have cropped up in footage at times but I haven't seen any lately.
According to the Russian Ministry of Defence (MoD) the "Z" symbol is an abbreviation of the phrase "for victory" (Russian: за победу, romanized: za pobedu), while the "V" symbol stands for "strength is in truth" (Russian: сила в правде, romanized: sila v pravde) and "The task will be completed" .... Posted on their Telegram account on 3rd March. This has been widely dismissed as utter BS by military analysts in the west
From what I can gather the following is a more reasonable explanation (taken from several confirmatory sources):
Vehicles marked "Z" are from the Eastern Military District (of Russia)
Vehicles marked "V" are from the Russian naval infantry
Vehicles marked "O" are from the Russian army stationed in Belarus
It is known the the "Z" inside a square box indicates Russian army forces originating in Crimea, and this symbol has only really been seen to the west of Mariupol and around places like Kherson.
Vehicles marked "X" belong to Kadyrov's mob
Belarus has permitted Russian Federation forces to use Belarus as a staging post and to fire missiles from Belarussian territory, but the war is very unpopular with the general public in Belarus. According to the Charter 97 news channel, reporting on 5 and 6 March 2022, most low-ranked Belarusian soldiers were opposed to participating in the invasion of Ukraine. Charter 97 and its chief editor, Natalya Radina, also stated that Belarusian officers reported to their seniors that they would risk mutiny or mass surrender if they took their units into Ukraine. Deployment of Belarusian soldiers in a fully-fledged war would also represent a radical break with Lukashenko's cornerstone ideology of "peace and stability" and raise the question of Lukashenko's support from a critical part of Belarusian society that thus far has been hesitant to openly oppose the regime. Certainly Lukashenko has not public admitted to commiting forces - a rather odd thing for such a pompous and bellicose individual, wouldn't you say?
Last edited by a moderator: