Very few contributors seem to be making any attempt to see the opposing point of view, so the debate never moves on.
To anyone who opposes the death penalty:
Can you not see the point of view of people who want it? It's possible, nay healthy, to express anger at truly murderous and perverted acts, but expression of the desire doesn't make such a person a killer any more than your desire to imprison people makes you a jailer.
To anyone who supports the death penalty:
Can you not put aside your emotions for one moment, and consider why some people don't want it? Many of you argue the need for capital punishment on the grounds that there's no other acceptable way of dealing with the worst cases, but where's the balance? There's a broad spectrum of crimes and culpability, and no forthcoming definition of where to draw the line.
One thing I've not yet seen explained anywhere is why an innocent life is worth so much less than a guilty death.