I'll say it again, the authorities and legal process should treat EVERYONE the same. It ain't rocket science.
But what if they don't. If there is already an unconscious bias baked into the system, how should it be corrected.
I'll say it again, the authorities and legal process should treat EVERYONE the same. It ain't rocket science.
How the feck should I know.But what if they don't. If there is already an unconscious bias baked into the system, how should it be corrected.
How the feck should I know.
You’d start by proving it exists, before looking to “solve” the problem.But what if they don't. If there is already an unconscious bias baked into the system, how should it be corrected.
That sounds like a very woke argument. It is impossible to treat every crime the same, they are many different mitigating and aggravating factors. I recall a London football hooligan who complained of getting a higher sentence from a rural magistrate than he would from his usual London beak. Deterrence alone is a factor. It is discrimination for non relevant factors that is the issue, whichever side of the argument you are on.I'll say it again, the authorities and legal process should treat EVERYONE the same. It ain't rocket science.
Ha Ha Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.That sounds like a very woke argument. It is impossible to treat every crime the same, they are many different mitigating and aggravating factors. I recall a London football hooligan who complained of getting a higher sentence from a rural magistrate than he would from his usual London beak. Deterrence alone is a factor. It is discrimination for non relevant factors that is the issue, whichever side of the argument you are on.
Trump loves the uneducated.Ha Ha Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.
Sorry, all I can do is laugh as the ludicrousness of this statement. Wait, I'm about to laugh again ...
Ha Ha Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.
It’s an argument, I was expecting a reasoned response. Here’s some research to back up the approach adopted.Ha Ha Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.
Sorry, all I can do is laugh as the ludicrousness of this statement. Wait, I'm about to laugh again ...
Ha Ha Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.
someone's slipped a purple haze in his kool-ayd...you'll have to give him some time to come round.It’s an argument, I was expecting a reasoned response. Here’s some research to back up the approach adopted.
Not according to actual legal experts. Like criminal barristers, i.e those who passed the exams rather than became lecturers in criminology.It’s an argument, I was expecting a reasoned response. Here’s some research to back up the approach adopted.
He’s got an ologyOf which there is no evidence,
Not according to actual legal experts. Like criminal barristers, i.e those who passed the exams rather than became lecturers in criminology.
I only give reasoned responses where the assertion/point/question makes sense in the context of whatever I previously posted.It’s an argument, I was expecting a reasoned response. Here’s some research to back up the approach adopted.