- Joined
- 7 Sep 2022
- Messages
- 2,945
- Reaction score
- 778
- Country
Mm, very slow flowing indeedEV fires are viscous
Mm, very slow flowing indeedEV fires are viscous
EVs catch fire from water. ICEs don't. There are more ways for EVs to ignite and the subsequent fire/explosion more intense. The risk is higher and insurance reflects that accordingly.Nutjob and others try to tell us this is more likely with ev's.
Some proof of your insurance claim then?EVs catch fire from water. ICEs don't. There are more ways for EVs to ignite and the subsequent fire/explosion more intense. The risk is higher and insurance reflects that accordingly.
I told you already. The next door is under my advisement, They will not buy EV and will not move.So you are lying to him.
How utterly disgusting.
I'll change my wish, then, to "I hope he moves, and the new occupant treats you as a liar deserves to be treated. And buys an EV".
And are you saying that rain is dangerous to an EV ?
Yep, no facts, as I thought.Rain, condensation, steam, flood, tea, you name it.
Rain, condensation, steam, flood, tea, cola, you name it.
It's nothing to do with an MP.I expect that when this ill-informed MP starts getting into his bill,
He doesn't.he'll realise that lumping EVs in with scooters and bikes,
You made a mistake there.I told you already. The next door is under my advisement, They will not buy EV and will not move.
It's nothing to do with an MP.
Or any MPs yet.
He doesn't.
Don't do a Nutjob - read the bill.
Are you another of these swivel-eyed loonies who just will not take any notice of facts and evidence which conflict with your ignorance and prejudice?