Truthful resource is you? I normally rely on visual evidence for all my stuff.
EV are they worth it?
- Thread starter ericmark
- Start date
- Status
Sponsored Links
Go for a walk round your town and photograph all the burning and exploding cars you see.
Record the date, place and registration number.
You first, with photos of the ICE cars..
How much does the job pay?
Sponsored Links
Is it though?
Do you have any proof of that apart from one random person quoted on a YT video posted by an anti-EV fanatic saying they "heard from a friend of a friend"?
And if premiums are higher, is it because an EV charge point makes the house more valuable? Or has been installed in a location which creates a trip hazard? Or is an expensive piece of equipment fixed to the outside of the house, and thieves have started stealing charging cables?
I've just tried two of the well known insurance comparison websites, where they ask all sorts of questions like flood risk, subsidence risk, type of house construction, value of property, rebuild cost, claims history, security, are there smokers, occupation, criminal records....
Neither ask about either EV parking or EV charge points.
Done that. There are no burning or exploding cars of any kind.
There was no mention of friend of a friend. Since you are making stuff up, you are less trust worthy than guy in video.
You lied above, per my response.
No it isn't.
Someone throwing 1kg of sodium metal into a lake is unrelated to batteries of any kind.
Fair enough. A sodium ion battery would have about 7kg + 20% = 8.4kg of sodium metal in it. That would be difficult to throw. A two handed toss might work.
When you consider the intelligence of the people here reading your posts, what standards do you use?
Yours?
Apparently not, per my YT link.
In general, I can assure everybody about three fundamentals of the insurance business.
1) They are incredibly driven by risk data.
2) They don't like to go bust.
3) Any insurer who renders themselves uncompetitive by setting premiums, or refusing business, based on emotive non-facts and rumours and swivel-eyed lies, rather than solid actuarial data will go bust.
1) They are incredibly driven by risk data.
2) They don't like to go bust.
3) Any insurer who renders themselves uncompetitive by setting premiums, or refusing business, based on emotive non-facts and rumours and swivel-eyed lies, rather than solid actuarial data will go bust.
Wrong.
- Status
Sponsored Links
Similar threads
