hottest weather ever in the world ever.

[JohnD]

gone's post is a total fraud.

'Hockey Stick' graph of rising global temperatures is accurate depiction of climate change

A video viewed thousands of times online disputes the reliability of an authoritative graph showing cooling global temperatures over 1,000 years and rapid warming in the 20th century. A speaker in the clip claims the chart falsely inflates the impact of man-made climate change. However, the...

www.reuters.com

 

[JohnD]

more nonsense from filly

Climate myths: The 'hockey stick' graph has been proven wrong

Despite repeated claims that the famous temperature reconstruction is at best seriously flawed and at worst a fraud, all the evidence supports it

www.newscientist.com

 

[JohnD]

"Details of the claims and counterclaims involve lengthy and arcane statistical arguments, so let’s skip straight to the 2006 report of the US National Academy of Science (pdf). The academy was asked by Congress to assess the validity of temperature reconstructions, including the hockey stick.

“Array of evidence”​

The report states: “The basic conclusion of Mann et al. (1998, 1999) was that the late 20th century warmth in the Northern Hemisphere was unprecedented during at least the last 1000 years. This conclusion has subsequently been supported by an array of evidence that includes both additional large-scale surface temperature reconstructions and pronounced changes in a variety of local proxy indicators, such as melting on ice caps and the retreat of glaciers around the world”.

Most researchers would agree that while the original hockey stick can – and has – been improved in a number of ways, it was not far off the mark. Most later temperature reconstructions fall within the error bars of the original hockey stick. Some show far more variability leading up to the 20th century than the hockey stick, but none suggest that it has been warmer at any time in the past 1000 years than in the last part of the 20th century."

 

[JohnD]

"none suggest that it has been warmer at any time in the past 1000 years than in the last part of the 20th century."

 

[fillyboy]

gone's post is a total fraud.

'Hockey Stick' graph of rising global temperatures is accurate depiction of climate change

A video viewed thousands of times online disputes the reliability of an authoritative graph showing cooling global temperatures over 1,000 years and rapid warming in the 20th century. A speaker in the clip claims the chart falsely inflates the impact of man-made climate change. However, the...

www.reuters.com

more nonsense from filly

Climate myths: The 'hockey stick' graph has been proven wrong

Despite repeated claims that the famous temperature reconstruction is at best seriously flawed and at worst a fraud, all the evidence supports it

www.newscientist.com

"Details of the claims and counterclaims involve lengthy and arcane statistical arguments, so let’s skip straight to the 2006 report of the US National Academy of Science (pdf). The academy was asked by Congress to assess the validity of temperature reconstructions, including the hockey stick.

“Array of evidence”​

The report states: “The basic conclusion of Mann et al. (1998, 1999) was that the late 20th century warmth in the Northern Hemisphere was unprecedented during at least the last 1000 years. This conclusion has subsequently been supported by an array of evidence that includes both additional large-scale surface temperature reconstructions and pronounced changes in a variety of local proxy indicators, such as melting on ice caps and the retreat of glaciers around the world”.

Most researchers would agree that while the original hockey stick can – and has – been improved in a number of ways, it was not far off the mark. Most later temperature reconstructions fall within the error bars of the original hockey stick. Some show far more variability leading up to the 20th century than the hockey stick, but none suggest that it has been warmer at any time in the past 1000 years than in the last part of the 20th century."

"none suggest that it has been warmer at any time in the past 1000 years than in the last part of the 20th century."

Tell us about the medieval warm period omitted from the graph, or Michael Mann,s refusal to furnish courts with his data, or how his legal fights against people rubbishing his claims with Mann losing and paying the other party's legal fees.

Mann is a fraud. A proven fraud.

 

[JohnD]

no, you show us the evidence that you think supports your loony conspiracy theorist.

 

[Munroast]

Tell us about the medieval warm period omitted from the graph, .....

The Climate Epochs That Weren't

Climate scientists often invoke the Medieval Warm Period and the Little Ice Age as natural worldwide climate swings predating human influences. They may not have worked the way we think.

news.climate.columbia.edu

 

[fillyboy]

no, you show us the evidence that you think supports your loony conspiracy thorist.

The fact Mann's claims have been successfully challenged in a court of law hardly suggests it's a loony conspiracy theory. Munroast's link is interesting in that the medieval warming and mini ice age 'may' not have been global but it's amusing that they dismiss the medieval warming as merely a couple of degrees increase in temperature when other scientists today will argue that a couple of degrees increase in temperature means armageddon.

 

[JohnD]

...fact ...

still no evidence from filly to support his loony conspiracy theory.

 

[ellal]

The fact Mann's claims have been successfully challenged in a court of law hardly suggests it's a loony conspiracy theory. Munroast's link is interesting in that the medieval warming and mini ice age 'may' not have been global but it's amusing that they dismiss the medieval warming as merely a couple of degrees increase in temperature when other scientists today will argue that a couple of degrees increase in temperature means armageddon.

A couple of degrees heat increase at a time when the world population was a tiny fraction of what it is today is hardly comparable...

 

[mitch66]

London is predicted to hit 40 degrees on monday - you still think Global Warming is a myth?

Predicted? Conclusive evidence to you no doubt.

 

[Munroast]

Hitting 40 degrees or even 45 degess will in itself will be no proof of climate change, it could be just a freak event - It is the fact that these freak once-in-a-century weather events are occurring so often and globally that is the proof that the climate is changing.

 

[Vinty]

Vladimir Putin will probably solve the climate crisis, once the nuclear war is over, human Co2 emissions wont be a problem because there wont be any.

 

[Ihavenojob]

A couple of degrees heat increase at a time when the world population was a tiny fraction of what it is today is hardly comparable...

Why were there a couple of degrees rise in temperature if the population was so small, other factors rather than humans?

 

[Trazor]

Why were there a couple of degrees rise in temperature if the population was so small, other factors rather than humans?

Please, it's cruel to make ellal think.