Opt out of border control

Sponsored Links
Noychy facts again and its the real result of PR its stupid to support a system that makes forming a government take months.
Countries with FPTP style systems like U.K. and USA have amongst the highest rankings for wealth inequality

Those countries with fairer wealth distribution, better standard of living across low and middle income groups and properly funded public services have some form of PR democratic system


Andy, maybe you could do some research and broaden your mind
 
What the hell are you on about Notchy? This thread is regarding border controls. Your well nonsense about EDI is just lefty baloney and nonsense.

No need to broaden my mind I can see left wing socialist attempts at equality a mile off.

Edited as too personal a response.
 
Sponsored Links
Those countries with fairer wealth distribution, better standard of living across low and middle income groups and properly funded public services have some form of PR democratic system
Even you get something right now and again.
 
What the hell are you on about Notchy? This thread is regarding border controls.
no

see Nosealls post above

Your well nonsense about EDI is just lefty baloney and nonsense
no idea what equality, diversity and inclusion has to do with voting systems


No need to broaden my mind I can see left wing socialist attempts at equality a mile off.
you are clueless

completely and utterly

fair wealth distribution has FA to do with socialism

All fair wealth distribution means is that working people at the lower end of the income scale can afford to live in a decent home, afford enough food and heating and be provided with decent public services................you seem to think those things are disgusting attempts at equality

By the way, Old Bean, countries like Sweden, Denmark, Germany, France etc are all capitalist countries but have better standards of living and better public services


try broadening your mind.
 
Now boys and girls please read the thread title. Please start a new thread if you want to spout on about equality and make up lies and believe your own warped rhetoric.
 
UKIP under the FPTP system have won zero seats in general elections.
Under PR they could have won up to 100 seats.
Even Tommy ten names could be a legitimate politician.
 
and make up lies and believe your own warped rhetoric.
Let's see who introduced 'PR voting' in the thread.

Bless my soul!.....
Interesting development in Holland after they finally agreed a government. Well it is shorter than he 270 odd days it took last time but then that's the benefit of PR voting.
Get that memory checked boyo, you're losing it.
 
Nosey I know its difficult for you but please read the thread title. Its quite clear.
 
UKIP under the FPTP system have won zero seats in general elections.
Under PR they could have won up to 100 seats.
Even Tommy ten names could be a legitimate politician.
Yep I did point that out and Carmen bless thought that was perfectly OK to have extremists and other parties who don't represent the majority having seats. OK I can see that point until some vacuous politician forms an alliance with said to get into power.

Who remembers the liberal election slogan of no tuition fees until they smelt a chance of power and reneged on the spot.
 
Yep I did point that out and Carmen bless thought that was perfectly OK to have extremists and other parties who don't represent the majority having seats. OK I can see that point until some vacuous politician forms an alliance with said to get into power.

Who remembers the liberal election slogan of no tuition fees until they smelt a chance of power and reneged on the spot.
1. Is the party/person standing legally allowed to do so? If not its up to the legal authorities to act

2. I don't support or would vote for him/them

3 only majority parties should stand for election ?

It's not democracy that you want
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top