How so?Really stupid for EU officials to disrespect a newly formed government like this
How so?Really stupid for EU officials to disrespect a newly formed government like this
Countries with FPTP style systems like U.K. and USA have amongst the highest rankings for wealth inequalityNoychy facts again and its the real result of PR its stupid to support a system that makes forming a government take months.
Really....What the hell are you on about Notchy? This thread is regarding border controls
This little nugget was in your opening post, lol. Get yourself to the doctors mate for a cognitive check-up, quick.but then that's the benefit of PR voting.
Even you get something right now and again.Those countries with fairer wealth distribution, better standard of living across low and middle income groups and properly funded public services have some form of PR democratic system
noWhat the hell are you on about Notchy? This thread is regarding border controls.
no idea what equality, diversity and inclusion has to do with voting systemsYour well nonsense about EDI is just lefty baloney and nonsense
you are cluelessNo need to broaden my mind I can see left wing socialist attempts at equality a mile off.
Yes, and if that's what is voted for why shouldn't it happen?
67.9% voted against PRDoesn't make it right, does it
Let's see who introduced 'PR voting' in the thread.and make up lies and believe your own warped rhetoric.
Get that memory checked boyo, you're losing it.Interesting development in Holland after they finally agreed a government. Well it is shorter than he 270 odd days it took last time but then that's the benefit of PR voting.
Yep I did point that out and Carmen bless thought that was perfectly OK to have extremists and other parties who don't represent the majority having seats. OK I can see that point until some vacuous politician forms an alliance with said to get into power.UKIP under the FPTP system have won zero seats in general elections.
Under PR they could have won up to 100 seats.
Even Tommy ten names could be a legitimate politician.
1. Is the party/person standing legally allowed to do so? If not its up to the legal authorities to actYep I did point that out and Carmen bless thought that was perfectly OK to have extremists and other parties who don't represent the majority having seats. OK I can see that point until some vacuous politician forms an alliance with said to get into power.
Who remembers the liberal election slogan of no tuition fees until they smelt a chance of power and reneged on the spot.
...and your all important opening post came AFTER the thread title. The subject of PR - introduced by YOU, is fair game boyo.Nosey I know its difficult for you but please read the thread title. Its quite clear.