Then by your understanding of the definition of terrorist the designation must apply to Russia and Israel, and other armed struggles.FFS. Any group that deliberatetly targets, murders, mutilates and kidnaps civilians with the sole intention of causing fear, terror and disruption are by definition terrorists.
Your justification for not using the correct term is an attempt to legitimise your antisemtism and racism.
As explained by Barack Obama, it isn't anti-Semitic to support Paleatinians, nor to criticise the policies of Israel.
I've already posted this, yet you continue with your dishonest accusations.
The UK publishes a list of organisations banned under UK law.
They're not necessarily proscribed terrorsit organisations by all, because it's a political ploy to designate which groups are terorist.
Of course it's not irrelevant.The IRA were terrorists. Whether the US designated them as terrorists is irrelevent.
It is the proof that the designation of which organisations are terrorists, or not, is a political ploy, nothing more, nothing less.
Do you assume that UK did not pressurise USA to designate IRA as terrorists, but they resisited? Don't be naive.
I suspect the UK harbours some terrorsits as designated by other countries.
Israel's policies and attacks have been against Palestinians for decades. The Hamas incursion into Israel did not occur in a vacuum.But at least the IRA usually gave warnings before their bombs, the numbers of victims involved in each attack were a fraction of what Hamas killed, mutuliated and kidnapped and their attacks were frequently against British forces, Police and Politicians. It just demonstrates how evil Hamas really are when the IRA are seen as a more moral class of terrorist.
Israel has also carried extra-judicial killings around the world, and carried out military strikes against its neighbours multiple times.
Last edited: