Angela Rayner

fillyboy said:

Labour's Angela Rayner was forced to flee out the back door of a pub this afternoon, after a campaign event was hijacked by tax protestors.

Ms Rayner was visiting Teesside with Labour's Shadow Chancellor Rachel Reeves when the campaign stunt disrupted their plans.

Walking down Yarm highstreet, Ms Rayner was seen hiding under an umbrella as activists wearing 'Tax inspector' high-vis vests unveiled a giant banner reading: "Angela Rayner: Tax dodger?"
Click to expand...
Those 'protestors' seemed well prepared. Did I hear the word stunt....
 
Sponsored Links
The issue is very straight forward. Either AR or her husband will have a liability for CGT for the period they were married up to 2015 when her house was sold.

“When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth.”
Click to expand...

If AR's legal advice is correct and it isn't her, then it must be her husband.
 
Last edited:
noseall said:
Surely it does? How else does a married couple with two homes, decide which one they declare as their CGT liability?
Click to expand...

Exactly. It is a matter of fact. For the period from when they were married up until when she sold up, either AR's house was the main home or her husband's was. Contrary to what MBK has been saying, their living arrangements during that period are very important.
 
Sponsored Links
motorbiking said:
remember it is not "main" home that is the issue.. its the fact that she is married and can only have one shared with her husband.
Click to expand...

Surely, the "main" home is absolutely the issue. It is either her house or her husband's house. It doesn't matter whether one "moved in" with the other. It was you who kept bringing that up, not me.

S222(6) TCGA92 sets out that spouses or civil partners .... can only have one main residence between them for the purpose of private residence relief.
Click to expand...
 
JonathanM said:
Surely, the "main" home is absolutely the issue.
Click to expand...
She declared her house as the exempt one. Job done.

MBK will just have to go back to hating her for being a woman from now on. Well at least until after the GE where she may decide he has to pay more tax (snigger).
 
noseall said:
She declared her house as the exempt one. Job done.
Click to expand...

That is possible, but I think unlikely, because she claims to have had no knowledge of the CGT rules about two homes when she sold.

If that is the case, I believe it would be a matter of fact.

www.gov.uk

CG64545 - Private residence relief: two or more residences: no valid notice made - HMRC internal manual - GOV.UK

www.gov.uk www.gov.uk

Where a notice is not made, or an invalid notice is made, the residence which attracts relief is the dwelling-house which is the main residence as a matter of fact.
Click to expand...
 
noseall said:
Surely it does? How else does a married couple with two homes, decide which one they declare as their CGT liability?
Click to expand...
They had 2 years to do this. I think she might have mentioned it, had she done it.

see above and click previous page
 
JohnD said:
Like your imaginary press release

That you pretended proved some other non-tory woman to be guilty of an imaginary crime.

Didn't exist.
Click to expand...
You’re guilty of making statements that can’t be backed up.
 
Doesn’t matter if HMRC take no action public opinion (based on a poll) says 3/4 say she should publish the advice she took and come clean.

Starmer will ditch her like he did the other toxic lefties.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Sponsored Links

Similar threads

P
Council tax. review.
2
Replies
23
Views
2K
Damocles
D
O
Ealing council smoking police
5 6 7
Replies
94
Views
8K
blup
B
L
thank you salford city council
Replies
13
Views
3K
joe-90
joe-90
B
  • Poll
Brown in history books
5 6 7
Replies
92
Views
8K
Norcon
N
Ian H
Buying more garden?
3 4 5
Replies
66
Views
5K
Brigadier
B
Back
Top