Head of the snake chopped off.

[fillyboy]

Israel ignore UN resolutions at will. Unless they like them...

So you agree with Odds that Israel has no legal right to exist?

 

[ajohn]

So you agree with Odds that Israel has no legal right to exist?

In some ways that relates to a person's view on colonialism. This is what established the state of Palestine and a place for Israeli to live in. Few Jews did compared with Arabs but they coexisted.

Other countries in the area wont be happy about this even before anything really happens. Then add a bit of expansionism and all really kicks off.

Some Jews say there is no such place and that the people who lived in it are effectively none existent yet info states that they were there.

On the other hand we get "from the river to the sea" and "step over the water into the promised land".

 

[denso13]

So you agree with Odds that Israel has no legal right to exist?

No. Just funny when people pick and chose which resolutions to ignore.

 

[T&G]

So you agree with me that the State of Israel is perfectly legal, has a right to exist as a sovereign state and that the land wasn't 'stolen from the arabs', rather it was gifted to Israel by way of UN resolution 181.

You go along with that?

UN has no mandate to give away land belonging to others.
Only the original owners can do that.
So if the UN acted in contravention of their own Charter, the creation of the state of Israel was illegal, according to the UN Charter.
But the Palestinians have since accepted the creation of the state of Israel, within the pre 1967 and original UN lines.
Now Israel has taken even more land and refuses to follow UN Resolutions to return that land.

Israel cannot claim that UN Resolutions gifted them land then ignore the same organisation's resolutions when it feels like it.

 

[motorbiking]

More lies

Motorbiking is weaponising anti semitism.

Motorbiking says criticising Israel’s atrocities in Gaza is racism.

Motorbiking needs to address his own failings first

so you think:
"His Islamophobia is probably what motivates his support for Israel."
Is a perfectly rational explanation for someone to support them?

You don't think it intentionally dismisses any genuine reason to support/defend them and tries to paint a picture that anyone supporting them must be a racist?

What would you say if I said:

Your hatred od jews is probably what motivates your support for Hamas.

Perhaps that is why you attack anyone who points out the obvious.

 

[ajohn]

So if the UN acted in contravention of their own Charter, the creation of the state of Israel was illegal, according to the UN Charter.

it was created before these rules existed. The new rules via the UN came about to entirely prevent this type of action. Stick to them and no country can wage war to seize and occupy land.

 

[fillyboy]

UN has no mandate to give away land belonging to others.
Only the original owners can do that.
So if the UN acted in contravention of their own Charter, the creation of the state of Israel was illegal, according to the UN Charter.
But the Palestinians have since accepted the creation of the state of Israel, within the pre 1967 and original UN lines.
Now Israel has taken even more land and refuses to follow UN Resolutions to return that land.

Israel cannot claim that UN Resolutions gifted them land then ignore the same organisation's resolutions when it feels like it.

So you're saying Israel doesn't have the right to exist. OK.

And you're saying I'M a racist?

 

[fillyboy]

No. Just funny when people pick and chose which resolutions to ignore.

So do you or do you not believe the State of Israel has a right to exist?

 

[denso13]

So do you or do you not believe the State of Israel has a right to exist?

I've already said they have a right to exist.

 

[fillyboy]

I've already said they have a right to exist.

Thank you, and I believe Palestine has a right to exist.